Tails I can see, but what function does docking the ears have?
Aren't dog clubs in Europe banning the practice now?
Aren't dog clubs in Europe banning the practice now?
just a guess, but perhaps the breeds you're referring to are older breeds and the more recent preference of cropping & docking were seen as an improvement.Originally Posted By: ChicagocanineIt is purely for cosmetic reasons in most cases. I never understood the whole "oh they needed to be cropped/docked for their job" when there are plenty of other breeds that had the same original job, have similar ears and/or tail types and were NEVER docked or cropped!
then we need to telepathically connect with Mr Max von Stephanitz and ask what he was thinking because it was NOT a fun month when Gia sprained her tail. I've never heard a dog scream the way she did when that happenedOriginally Posted By: Chris Wild
As for tails, I've also been told by several Dobe people that docked tails are better for the dog. Their tails are so long, thin and whip like, and Dobe's are quite the tail waggers, that broken tails are not uncommon. Whereas with docked tails, obviously that's a non-issue.
See, this is where I don't understand it. If Boerboels and Rotties should be docked because they are prone to tail injuries (or causing injuries with their tails) then why aren't other breeds with similar tail types docked too? Shouldn't we dock all mastiff breeds, and Great Danes? They all have thick and strong tails and can be prone to injury due to this. So in this case shouldn't all mastiff breeds be docked at birth to prevent injuries too? Labradors as well, tail injuries are also very common to them. Additionally Labs are prone to a condition called "cold-water tail" or "dead tail" which can be very painful.Originally Posted By: RavenSophiIt recently became illegal in South Africa to dock tails, ear cropping has been illegal for a long time. I have to agree, I don't see the necessity of cropping ears but docking tails is an entirely different story. Boerboel and Rottweilers are two breeds I can think of that definitely need docked tails. They're sturdy dogs with thick, big tails that hurt not only their owners by wagging but also themselves. It is a part of the body that bleeds a lot and you find it difficult to stop the bleeding if the tip of the tail is injured. And since it's their way of showing emotion the tail doesn't have enough time to heal as it wags every minute (if you have a happy dog). So I think the notion that it's cruel and for cosmetic purposes when it comes to tail docking is nonsense! Ears, as I said, different story, or maybe not...maybe they also have good reasons we just don't know about.
Again if this was the case why don't we crop more breeds ears? Labradors and Goldens are VERY prone to ear infections, and these can lead to serious issues like hematomas of the ears, loss of hearing, skin infections, etc... They are also prone to hotspots around the ears partially due to wetness accumulating underneath the ear flap. I don't know if you've ever seen a dog with a severe hot spot around the ear but it is pretty horrible. (If you're curious, here is a photo.) If ear cropping is so important for Dobermans to prevent ear infections than why aren't we cropping Labs and Goldens too? Oh and what about Cocker Spaniels? They have notoriously bad ears and many even go deaf due to chronic ear problems.Originally Posted By: Chris Wild
I've also been told by several Dobe people regarding ears that not only is it tradition from a looks/intimidation/less to grab onto standpoint but also that Dobe's with natural ears are much more prone to ear infections than Dobes's with cropped ears. Their theory being that cropped ears stay more dry. Not sure if that is true or just justification for cropping.
Again here, there are a number of breeds with long whip-like thin tails which are prone to breaking or injury. Why are they not docking those breeds as well? For example sighthounds have these sort of tails. I know Greyhound has a high instance of tail injuries. Other breeds have this type of tail as well and are not docked including the Irish Water Spaniel, Catahoula, Setters, English Pointers, Foxhounds, etc...Originally Posted By: Chris Wild
As for tails, I've also been told by several Dobe people that docked tails are better for the dog. Their tails are so long, thin and whip like, and Dobe's are quite the tail waggers, that broken tails are not uncommon. Whereas with docked tails, obviously that's a non-issue.
Originally Posted By: Chicagocanine
Again if this was the case why don't we crop more breeds ears?
Who knows, might be happier, healthier Goldens and Labs and sighthouds out there if they did.Originally Posted By: Chicagocanine
Again here, there are a number of breeds with long whip-like thin tails which are prone to breaking or injury. Why are they not docking those breeds as well?
Rotties are docked becuase they were bred to pull a cart. Tail got in the way and the dog got injured, not them injuring someone with the tail. Personally I like an undocked rott.Quote:Rotties should be docked because they are prone to tail injuries (or causing injuries with their tails) then why aren't other breeds with similar tail types docked too?
In that case why don't Greater Swiss Mountain Dogs have docked tails? I thought they were originally bred as draft dogs as well.Originally Posted By: SunCzarinaRotties are docked becuase they were bred to pull a cart. Tail got in the way and the dog got injured, not them injuring someone with the tail. Personally I like an undocked rott.Quote:Rotties should be docked because they are prone to tail injuries (or causing injuries with their tails) then why aren't other breeds with similar tail types docked too?
Swissies and Rotties are close to the same height range. Males can be up to 1.5" taller than the max height for Rotties but the range is similar.Originally Posted By: SunCzarinaDon't know - possibly becuase they're much larger (or atleast the ones I've seen were) and the tail would have cleared the top of the wagon? Or maybe they didn't care about fur in the food?
i'm with you... perhaps even worse. a dobie i'd crop... a boxer i *might*... a great dane i might as well, but lean more towards not (i think the fawns look great cropped, but not so much a harlequin)... with schnauzers i'd take a mini cropped, but a giant uncropped... i basically like drop ears when they are more lab in nature - fly away or raised ears can look silly on some breeds. anything with a short crop, i'll pass (they remind me of little devil horns) but the tall crops i like.Originally Posted By: GSDgirlALPersonally and I don't know what it is but if I were to get another Dobie, I would crop the ears. But, if I got a Boxer I wouldn't crop the ears. Don't ask me about my logic behind these theories b/c I don't even know what they are!