The original purpose of the document was to educate a family friend about breeders in the state and the importance of selecting a well bred German Shepherd to avoid costly health problems.
Ironically, this family friend went and picked up a
panda Shepherd within the week (before I could show them the document)... which is why I left the document untouched for a long time. At the time I'd been interested in a dog from DDR/Czech lines.
I do not claim to know everything about every kennel. That's simply not possible and you know that. However I can say that, "(person) said (claim) on (here), however, there is no evidence provided of (claim)."
Here's a direct example from the document:
"Unfortunately there’s little information from word of mouth on (kennel) online, other than a customer who claims to have a (Bitch)/(Sire) puppy that is At Risk for DM, and also has polygenetic EPI. As of 5/12/16, I have established contacted this customer and I am trying to obtain proof of this claim.
There are also various hints on
German Shepherds : German Shepherd Dog Forums forum that there were other unsatisfied customers. However, this particular website prohibits the downtalking of any breeder so I am pending information from that source."
I do not state these things are fact unless I have proof such as:
- (Dog) was, in fact, produced by (kennel)
- Official paperwork for the (health issue) of (dog)
- Permission from the (customer) to share this information. If I do not, I note it down that I have contacted (customer) but they declined to share information about (dog).
Every buyer should take care to obtain all proof of health testing and titles of each dog they are buying progeny from.
Although, I am thinking about ending production of this document as I do not wish to be the middle man between drama. I've had enough drama between me and the previous owner of the previously mentioned panda shepherd.