Fear might be the wrong word since he is not talking about true fear, maybe avoiding a dislike. I mean I'm not in true fear of getting a ticket but I would like to avoid it and I dislike the hassle and expense involved.Fear as a motivator?Consequences do not have to invoke fear to be effective. I get the point he's trying to make.
But not for all things all of the time is my point. Again, new owners thinking it's a good idea to base the beginning of the relationship with their dog on "do as I say Or Else". It's the way it was written is all.David Winners summed it up here:
"The threat of consequence has to be there, in the back of their mind, keeping them honest."
I think this is a great point to repeat! Consequences may apply in training dogs in some circumstances, but not to little puppies!But not for all things all of the time is my point. Again, new owners thinking it's a good idea to base the beginning of the relationship with their dog on "do as I say Or Else". It's the way it was written is all.
So how does a mother dog correct her little puppies?I think this is a great point to repeat! Consequences may apply in training dogs in some circumstances, but not to little puppies!
Age appropriately, of course!So how does a mother dog correct her little puppies?
Read what he wrote again:@hanshund nobody on this thread is against consequences. Tim and I don't feel the wording was a good choice.
Consequences aren’t just corrections and corrections aren’t just physical discomfort. Consequences, both good and bad, play a role in the dogs life from the very beginning. I think it’s an important piece of clear communication. 8 week old puppies are not little babies and are at very different stages of development from a human baby. An 8 week old puppy could be placed in an environment with food, water, shelter and survive. It takes a lot longer before a human baby is even able to feed itself. Its a long time before a baby is left to their own devices. It’s a poor comparison. I could go on but I think the point is made. Puppies are mature enough to understand corrections long before they leave their dam. If your puppy was chewing something inappropriate you would stop them and give them something appropriate typically. You would use the amount of force you need to however.I think this is a great point to repeat! Consequences may apply in training dogs in some circumstances, but not to little puppies!
Imagine the cognitive and developmental damage that would occur if a parent chose to slap a little human baby's hand everytime they grabbed an item and tried to put it in their mouth, as opposed to gently preventing the baby from mouthing anything harmful!
Consequences/aka corrections are not at all appropriate or beneficial until the puppy matures enough to understand. And even then should be carefully administered in an age appropriate manner!
I realize that baby puppies are not the focus of the blog post, but it's still good to emphasize IMO...
Truth be told, I liked the analogy, but got a bit lost in paragraph 3:
"The reality is, as much as folks want to believe in a fantasy land where authority, and fear of negative consequences play no role in dog training, or living well with dogs, anyone whos's more committed to truly honest observations than ideologically possession, will acknowledge that reality doesn't do the fantasy, utopian thing very well."
Say what? LOL!
Where I live there are too many people that have that "dictator" mentality towards their dogs.Then there's the other extremeConsequences can be good or bad. The things he’s addressing here is that to get the most reliable dog, that have to be aware of consequences both ways. There’s an emotional response to the use of the word fear. In a lot people’s minds it brings this image of cowering or always bringing down the hammer like a dictator. The wording isn’t wrong but could definitely be clearer. This is only addressing a piece of training that is often left out by certain crowds. I don’t think it’s meant to address it in it’s entirety as that is impossible to do.