I have never used the 1/2 hour before and after rule. You can leave the prong on, but keep an eye on his neck because the prong can rub a bit if left on for so long. I try to take it off whenever not in use.
As long as the prong is going on for as much fun stuff (trips to the store or park or even out to play ball) as for hard training sessions the dog will look forward to having it on if you don't bother with the 1/2 hour rule.Originally Posted By: KodeeGirlThanks, guys. That makes me feel better. John - I actually got the 1/2 hour rule from Ed Frawley's Leerburg site info.It's just supposed to help the dog not associate having the collar put on with "OK, I have to mind -that collar's on me again." Otherwise, the dog could end up acting like a PITA when he knows he doesn't have the prong on.![]()
I was just worried that there might be a reason not to leave it on for greater lengths of time. He's our only dog, so he doesn't wrestle around w/anyone, and I always take it off if he's unattended (like in the crate or in the car while I'm in the store.)
Thanks!
I don't know what to say other than wow...Originally Posted By: bearlasmom
Prong collars are a torture device.
This simply isn't true and I would be interested in seeing any information on provincial regulations against prong collars. As far as I know, the Ontario government has not stepped in and told dog owners what type of collars they can put on their dogs. Unfortunately, they do try to tell us what breeds we can and can't own, but that's a whole other thread.Originally Posted By: bearlasmomProng collars are a torture device. In most cities across Ontario they have been banned (thank you very much).
Dogs aren't children. If they were "trained" using the same methods, I would have invested in crates long before I ever had dogs.Originally Posted By: bearlasmomWe would never think of training a child with one, nor should we with a dog.
In this case, I would have to question the way the collar was first introduced to the dog, and the training abilities of the person using it. This is not a common reaction among dogs wearing a prong collar.Originally Posted By: bearlasmomhave you ever looked into the eyes of a dog that had been wearing a prong collar the first time and had it used? The happiness and light goes out and the look in their eyes is replaced with saddness and a look that says 'But i thought you love me."
Absolutely. They are not children. They are dogs. One of the most disrespectful things a dog owner can do to their dogs is to forget that, and treat him as something he is not.Originally Posted By: ardavis324 We must be careful not to always anthromorphisize our pets.
I have given myself e-collar corrections as well. I refuse to put something on my dogs that I will not test on myself. Stupid people do stupid things with and to children and other human beings every day much less poor animals. Because some other moron cannot train in a humane manner with a certain tool does not dictate that I cannot use it.I keep thinking maybe this person is mistaking a prong for something else.....studies have gone back for 40+ years that demonstrate how effective AND HUMANE the use of this tool is.
Dogs are manipulators and opportunists.. They learn easily how to play their handlers.. They become very good at it w/weak uneducated handlers!!Quote: have you ever looked into the eyes of a dog that had been wearing a prong collar the first time and had it used? The happiness and light goes out and the look in their eyes is replaced with saddness and a look that says 'But i thought you love me."