Joined
·
61 Posts
>
> This is really not good, please read
>
> Pennsylvania Legislations Fine Print
> Targets Everyone Who Owns A Dog
>
> Committee Hearing Scheduled For Thursday, June 12
>
> by JOHN YATES
> American Sporting Dog Alliance
> http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org
> <http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org>
> [email protected] <mailto:asda%40csonline.net>
>
> HARRISBURG, PA Legislation targeting kennels and more than a
> million individual dog owners in Pennsylvania faces a public
> hearing this coming Thursday before the state House Agriculture
> and Rural Affairs Committee. The June 12 hearing is scheduled for
> 10 a.m. in Room 140 at the Main Capitol Building.
>
> Todays report will focus on how the legislation affects all dog
> owners in Pennsylvania, even people who own only one dog. The
> legislation also paves the way for defacto spay and neuter
> mandates and tethering bans without legislative oversight and
> accountability, and casts a wide ranging electronic net over every
> dog owner to enforce proposed and current laws about tail docking,
> ear cropping, rabies vaccinations and other issues.
>
> A follow-up report will discuss the legislations impact on the
> states 2,700 licensed kennels.
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance urges all Pennsylvania dog
> owners to contact members of the committee to ask for changes in
> this broad-reaching legislation. If several significant changes
> are not made, the legislation should be rejected in its entirety.
>
> Rep. James Casorio (D- Westmoreland County) is the prime sponsor
> of the legislation (H.B. 2525) , which actually comes from Gov. Ed
> Rendell as the centerpiece of his vowed crackdown on alleged
> puppy mills in Pennsylvania. But the legislation is a classic
> shell game: With public attention focused on kennels, people have
> failed to notice the legislations impact on individual dog
> owners. An analysis of the legislation by The American Sporting
> Dog Alliance reveals a profound impact on all dog owners.
>
> Regulations for commercial kennels (puppy mills) actually are
> only a small part of the legislation. The rest of the legislation
> will affect individual dog owners and private kennel owners with
> much more stringent and invasive provisions, and grant the Bureau
> of Dog Law Enforcement virtually unlimited power to write new
> regulations with little or no public oversight.
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance strongly supports the parts of
> the legislation dealing with improving standards for commercial
> kennels. If anything, we would suggest even more stringent
> standards than are called for in the legislation.
>
> However, much of the legislation goes far beyond its promise to
> improve life for dogs in puppy mills, and has the strong
> potential to expose every dog owner in the state to unfair and
> devastating rules designed and implemented unilaterally by the
> Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement.
>
> We cannot allow ourselves to forget that several recent draft
> versions of proposed regulations were a nightmare for dog owners
> that would have forced many people to give up their pets and
> driven most of the states kennels out of business. While these
> proposed regulations have been scrapped for the political
> expediency of passing this legislation with minimal controversy in
> an election year, we frankly do not trust the Bureau with a blank
> check to write regulations at a future date without public and
> legislative oversight. The Casorio bill gives this power to the
> Bureau.
>
> Here is what this power means to dog owners.
>
> The relationship between legislation and regulations is confusing
> to many people. Legislation becomes the law, and the law
> authorizes the state bureaucracy to develop regulations (which are
> rules) to actually implement the law. Dog regulations now are
> subject to publication in The Pennsylvania Bulletin, a formal
> period to seek public comments, approval by the Legislatures
> Independent Regulatory Review Committee, and review by the House
> and Senate Agriculture committees.
>
> The Casorio legislation would scrap those protections by removing
> requirements for public notice and a hearing that are contained in
> the current law. We cannot accept this kind of blank check for the
> Bureau to do whatever it wishes in the future.
>
> From the point of view of anyone who owns even one dog, there are
> several other major problems with the Casorio/Rendell legislation,
> including:
>
>
> The homes, property and businesses of everyone who owns even one
> dog are defined as an establishment, as are every person in the
> household. The legislation gives state dog wardens unlimited power
> to enter any dog owners property and home to search, examine any
> dog for any reason, and examine personal or business records
> without a search warrant. Thus provision violates the privacy of
> more than one million Pennsylvania dog owners, as well as trashes
> constitutional protections.
>
>
> While counties will continue to issue individual dog licenses, the
> legislation requires them to send an electronic database to the
> Bureau listing everyone who buys a dog license, as well as
> complete information about the licensed dog. The Bureau also would
> be notified if anyone bounces a check for a dog license. This
> provision invades the privacy of everyone who owns a dog and
> subjects dog owners to targeted enforcement and home searches.
> Pending legislation would target people who own dogs that have
> docked tails or cropped ears, and this database would allow the
> Bureau to locate and file animal cruelty charges (a serious crime)
> for anyone who is unable to provide proof that the work was done
> by a veterinarian. Few owners of dogs are able to provide written
> proof, even though a veterinarian probably docked their dogs tail
> or cropped its ears.
>
>
> The legislation also gives the Bureau the authority to impose a
> defacto spay and neuter mandate. Current law sets license fees for
> intact dogs at $5, with lesser fees permissible for dogs that are
> spayed or neutered. The Casorio legislation removes the $5 fee and
> gives the Bureau a blank check to set whatever new fees it chooses
> by regulation, with no public or legislative oversight. In many
> states, license fees for dogs that are not spayed or neutered at
> set at $200 to $300 per year per dog. This is seen as a way to use
> annual license fees as a weapon to force dog owners to sterilize
> their pets, and the Casorio bill paves the way for this to happen
> here by Bureau edict, with no legislative accountability or
> oversight. The Casorio legislation requires counties to turn over
> spay and neuter information to the Bureau, along with verification
> of veterinary proof. We strongly oppose giving this kind of
> power to the Bureau.
>
>
> The current fine for failing to license a dog is $25. The
> legislation would increase this to a fine ranging from $50 to
> $300. These fines also would be imposed for people who fail to
> report a change of address, or who put down incorrect information
> on a dog license application.
>
>
> Dog day care providers are defined as boarding kennels, which is
> not a bad thing at face value. However, the legislation counts
> every day that a dog is in day care as a separate dog. If a dog is
> in day care for five days, it becomes five different dogs on
> paper. If one dog is in day care when its owner is at work, it
> suddenly becomes 260 different dogs over the course of a
> year! This means that anyone who provides day care or dog
> sitting services will have to pay very high license fees, as if
> they own a very large kennel. A teen-ager who gets paid $5 a day
> to watch a dog when its owner is at work, suddenly could face a
> $1,000 kennel license fee! A small commercial business that
> provides day care to 10 dogs a day, would be licensed as a
> 3,000-dog kennel when the years total of paper dogs are
> tallied! Dog sitting and day care are rapidly growing home
> businesses in modern America that greatly enhance the welfare of
> companion animals.
> People who do this valuable work would be driven out of business,
> and dog owners who need these services would be harmed.
>
>
> The unlimited power to create regulations without oversight also
> will affect individual dog owners decisions about how to care for
> their animals. The Bureau would be granted the power to create
> regulations that specify how anyone who owns a dog must house or
> care for it. For example, the Bureau would have the power to ban
> tethering of dogs with no action required by the Legislature. This
> both denies dog owners their basic rights as citizens, and also
> allows elected officials to escape accountability to the voters.
>
>
> The legislation also imposes unnecessary restrictions on rescue
> groups that rely on foster care provided by private individuals
> who care for a dog until a new owner can be found. The American
> Sporting Dog Alliance believes that animal shelters and rescue
> shelters should be regulated intensely as commercial kennels,
> because of the large numbers of dogs involved and because the high
> turnover of dogs from unknown sources increases the risk of
> disease and other problems. However, we do not believe that people
> who provide foster care to small numbers of rescued dogs should be
> subjected to this kind of intensive regulation. The law should not
> discourage these dedicated and caring people who do much good work
> to save the lives of many dogs. We propose a lesser standard of
> licensure for these small rescue and fostering homes, such as a
> token license fee and inspections only if a complaint has been
> filed. Care standards in foster homes should be simply defined as
> the normal standard of care for household pets. In plain English,
> these good people deserve to be given a break, as do the dogs they
> help.
>
>
> In all cases, the legislation says that the burden of proof rests
> with the owner of the dog. This is a perversion of the American
> system of justice, which holds that the burden of proof rests with
> the state. What the wording of the legislation means is that any
> dog owner is automatically guilty of a violation if he or she is
> unable to prove his or her innocence.
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance urges every Pennsylvania dog
> owner to immediately contact every member of the House Agriculture
> and Rural Affairs Committee, well before Thursdays hearing.
> Please refer to House Bill 2525, and tell the legislators why you
> are opposed to this bill.
>
> Here is contact information for every member of the committee
>
> Rep. Arthur D. Hershey
>
> 717-783-6435
>
> 717-705-1868
>
> [email protected] <mailto:ahershey%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Michele Brooks
>
> 717-783-5008
>
> 717-705-1948
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mbrooks%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Timothy Joseph Solobay
>
> 717-787-1188
>
> 717-705-1887
>
> [email protected] <mailto:tsolobay%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Peter J. Daley II
>
> 717-783-9333
>
> 717-783-7558
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dzeiders%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Tim Mahoney
>
> 717-775-2174
>
> 717-780-4786
>
> [email protected] <mailto:tmahoney%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Bob Bastian
>
> 717-783-8756
>
> 717-783-3899
>
> [email protected] <mailto:bbastian%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Thomas F. Yewcic
>
> 717-783-0248
>
> 717-787-4922
>
> [email protected]et <mailto:tyewcic%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Gary Haluska
>
> 717-787-3532
>
> 717-783-7548
>
> [email protected] <mailto:ghaluska%40pahouse.net>
>
> Chairman Michael K. Hanna
>
> 717-772-2283
>
> 717-787-4137
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mhanna%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. H. Scott Conklin
>
> 717-787-9473
>
> 717-780-4764
>
> [email protected] <mailto:sconklin%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Mike Fleck
>
> 717-787-3335
>
> 717-260-6504
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mfleck%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Mark K. Keller
>
> 717-783-1593
>
> 717-705-7012
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mkeller%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Robert W. Kauffman
>
> 717-705-2004
>
> 717-705-1951
>
> [email protected] <mailto:rkauffma%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Dan Moul
>
> 717-783-5217
>
> None Given
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dmoul%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. P. Michael Sturla
>
> (717) 787-3555
>
> (717) 705-1923
>
> [email protected] <mailto:rep.mikesturla%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. David S. Hickernell
>
> 717-783-2076
>
> 717-705-1946
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dhickern%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Gordon R. Denlinger
>
> 717-787-3531
>
> 717-705-1951
>
> [email protected] <mailto:gdenling%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. David R. Millard
>
> 717-783-1102
>
> 717-772-0094
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dmillard%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Tina Pickett
>
> 717-783-8238
>
> 717-705-1949
>
> [email protected] <mailto:tpickett%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Karen Boback
>
> 717-787-1117
>
> 717-705-1889
>
> [email protected] <mailto:kboback%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Mike Carroll
>
> 717-787-3589
>
> 717-780-4763
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mcarroll%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Jim Cox
>
> 717-772-2435
>
> 717-260-6516
>
> [email protected] <mailto:jcox%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. David R. Kessler
>
> 717-787-2769
>
> 717-780-4768
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dkessler%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Richard T. Grucela
>
> 717-705-1878
>
> 717-783-3180
>
> [email protected] <mailto:rgrucela%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Babette Josephs
>
> 717-787-8529
>
> 717-787-5066
>
> [email protected] <mailto:RepJosephs%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Harold James
>
> 717-787-9477
>
> 717-787-7517
>
> [email protected] <mailto:hjames%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Frank Louis Oliver Sr.
>
> 717-787-3480
>
> 717-783-0684
>
> [email protected] <mailto:foliver%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Rosita C. Youngblood
>
> 717-787-7727
>
> 717-772-1313
>
> [email protected] <mailto:ryoungbl%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. John Myers
>
> 717-787-3181
>
> 717-772-4038
>
> [email protected] <mailto:jmyers%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Mark B. Cohen
>
> 717-787-4117
>
> 717-787-6650
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mcohen%40pahouse.net>
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, hobby
> breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are
> used for hunting. We are a grassroots movement working to protect
> the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional
> relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place
> in American society and life. Please visit us on the web at
> http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org.
> <http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org.>
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we
> can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your
> membership, participation and support are truly essential to the
> success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of
> our members, and maintain strict independence.
>
> PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS
>
>
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance
> http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org
> <http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org>
>
> This is really not good, please read
>
> Pennsylvania Legislations Fine Print
> Targets Everyone Who Owns A Dog
>
> Committee Hearing Scheduled For Thursday, June 12
>
> by JOHN YATES
> American Sporting Dog Alliance
> http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org
> <http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org>
> [email protected] <mailto:asda%40csonline.net>
>
> HARRISBURG, PA Legislation targeting kennels and more than a
> million individual dog owners in Pennsylvania faces a public
> hearing this coming Thursday before the state House Agriculture
> and Rural Affairs Committee. The June 12 hearing is scheduled for
> 10 a.m. in Room 140 at the Main Capitol Building.
>
> Todays report will focus on how the legislation affects all dog
> owners in Pennsylvania, even people who own only one dog. The
> legislation also paves the way for defacto spay and neuter
> mandates and tethering bans without legislative oversight and
> accountability, and casts a wide ranging electronic net over every
> dog owner to enforce proposed and current laws about tail docking,
> ear cropping, rabies vaccinations and other issues.
>
> A follow-up report will discuss the legislations impact on the
> states 2,700 licensed kennels.
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance urges all Pennsylvania dog
> owners to contact members of the committee to ask for changes in
> this broad-reaching legislation. If several significant changes
> are not made, the legislation should be rejected in its entirety.
>
> Rep. James Casorio (D- Westmoreland County) is the prime sponsor
> of the legislation (H.B. 2525) , which actually comes from Gov. Ed
> Rendell as the centerpiece of his vowed crackdown on alleged
> puppy mills in Pennsylvania. But the legislation is a classic
> shell game: With public attention focused on kennels, people have
> failed to notice the legislations impact on individual dog
> owners. An analysis of the legislation by The American Sporting
> Dog Alliance reveals a profound impact on all dog owners.
>
> Regulations for commercial kennels (puppy mills) actually are
> only a small part of the legislation. The rest of the legislation
> will affect individual dog owners and private kennel owners with
> much more stringent and invasive provisions, and grant the Bureau
> of Dog Law Enforcement virtually unlimited power to write new
> regulations with little or no public oversight.
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance strongly supports the parts of
> the legislation dealing with improving standards for commercial
> kennels. If anything, we would suggest even more stringent
> standards than are called for in the legislation.
>
> However, much of the legislation goes far beyond its promise to
> improve life for dogs in puppy mills, and has the strong
> potential to expose every dog owner in the state to unfair and
> devastating rules designed and implemented unilaterally by the
> Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement.
>
> We cannot allow ourselves to forget that several recent draft
> versions of proposed regulations were a nightmare for dog owners
> that would have forced many people to give up their pets and
> driven most of the states kennels out of business. While these
> proposed regulations have been scrapped for the political
> expediency of passing this legislation with minimal controversy in
> an election year, we frankly do not trust the Bureau with a blank
> check to write regulations at a future date without public and
> legislative oversight. The Casorio bill gives this power to the
> Bureau.
>
> Here is what this power means to dog owners.
>
> The relationship between legislation and regulations is confusing
> to many people. Legislation becomes the law, and the law
> authorizes the state bureaucracy to develop regulations (which are
> rules) to actually implement the law. Dog regulations now are
> subject to publication in The Pennsylvania Bulletin, a formal
> period to seek public comments, approval by the Legislatures
> Independent Regulatory Review Committee, and review by the House
> and Senate Agriculture committees.
>
> The Casorio legislation would scrap those protections by removing
> requirements for public notice and a hearing that are contained in
> the current law. We cannot accept this kind of blank check for the
> Bureau to do whatever it wishes in the future.
>
> From the point of view of anyone who owns even one dog, there are
> several other major problems with the Casorio/Rendell legislation,
> including:
>
>
> The homes, property and businesses of everyone who owns even one
> dog are defined as an establishment, as are every person in the
> household. The legislation gives state dog wardens unlimited power
> to enter any dog owners property and home to search, examine any
> dog for any reason, and examine personal or business records
> without a search warrant. Thus provision violates the privacy of
> more than one million Pennsylvania dog owners, as well as trashes
> constitutional protections.
>
>
> While counties will continue to issue individual dog licenses, the
> legislation requires them to send an electronic database to the
> Bureau listing everyone who buys a dog license, as well as
> complete information about the licensed dog. The Bureau also would
> be notified if anyone bounces a check for a dog license. This
> provision invades the privacy of everyone who owns a dog and
> subjects dog owners to targeted enforcement and home searches.
> Pending legislation would target people who own dogs that have
> docked tails or cropped ears, and this database would allow the
> Bureau to locate and file animal cruelty charges (a serious crime)
> for anyone who is unable to provide proof that the work was done
> by a veterinarian. Few owners of dogs are able to provide written
> proof, even though a veterinarian probably docked their dogs tail
> or cropped its ears.
>
>
> The legislation also gives the Bureau the authority to impose a
> defacto spay and neuter mandate. Current law sets license fees for
> intact dogs at $5, with lesser fees permissible for dogs that are
> spayed or neutered. The Casorio legislation removes the $5 fee and
> gives the Bureau a blank check to set whatever new fees it chooses
> by regulation, with no public or legislative oversight. In many
> states, license fees for dogs that are not spayed or neutered at
> set at $200 to $300 per year per dog. This is seen as a way to use
> annual license fees as a weapon to force dog owners to sterilize
> their pets, and the Casorio bill paves the way for this to happen
> here by Bureau edict, with no legislative accountability or
> oversight. The Casorio legislation requires counties to turn over
> spay and neuter information to the Bureau, along with verification
> of veterinary proof. We strongly oppose giving this kind of
> power to the Bureau.
>
>
> The current fine for failing to license a dog is $25. The
> legislation would increase this to a fine ranging from $50 to
> $300. These fines also would be imposed for people who fail to
> report a change of address, or who put down incorrect information
> on a dog license application.
>
>
> Dog day care providers are defined as boarding kennels, which is
> not a bad thing at face value. However, the legislation counts
> every day that a dog is in day care as a separate dog. If a dog is
> in day care for five days, it becomes five different dogs on
> paper. If one dog is in day care when its owner is at work, it
> suddenly becomes 260 different dogs over the course of a
> year! This means that anyone who provides day care or dog
> sitting services will have to pay very high license fees, as if
> they own a very large kennel. A teen-ager who gets paid $5 a day
> to watch a dog when its owner is at work, suddenly could face a
> $1,000 kennel license fee! A small commercial business that
> provides day care to 10 dogs a day, would be licensed as a
> 3,000-dog kennel when the years total of paper dogs are
> tallied! Dog sitting and day care are rapidly growing home
> businesses in modern America that greatly enhance the welfare of
> companion animals.
> People who do this valuable work would be driven out of business,
> and dog owners who need these services would be harmed.
>
>
> The unlimited power to create regulations without oversight also
> will affect individual dog owners decisions about how to care for
> their animals. The Bureau would be granted the power to create
> regulations that specify how anyone who owns a dog must house or
> care for it. For example, the Bureau would have the power to ban
> tethering of dogs with no action required by the Legislature. This
> both denies dog owners their basic rights as citizens, and also
> allows elected officials to escape accountability to the voters.
>
>
> The legislation also imposes unnecessary restrictions on rescue
> groups that rely on foster care provided by private individuals
> who care for a dog until a new owner can be found. The American
> Sporting Dog Alliance believes that animal shelters and rescue
> shelters should be regulated intensely as commercial kennels,
> because of the large numbers of dogs involved and because the high
> turnover of dogs from unknown sources increases the risk of
> disease and other problems. However, we do not believe that people
> who provide foster care to small numbers of rescued dogs should be
> subjected to this kind of intensive regulation. The law should not
> discourage these dedicated and caring people who do much good work
> to save the lives of many dogs. We propose a lesser standard of
> licensure for these small rescue and fostering homes, such as a
> token license fee and inspections only if a complaint has been
> filed. Care standards in foster homes should be simply defined as
> the normal standard of care for household pets. In plain English,
> these good people deserve to be given a break, as do the dogs they
> help.
>
>
> In all cases, the legislation says that the burden of proof rests
> with the owner of the dog. This is a perversion of the American
> system of justice, which holds that the burden of proof rests with
> the state. What the wording of the legislation means is that any
> dog owner is automatically guilty of a violation if he or she is
> unable to prove his or her innocence.
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance urges every Pennsylvania dog
> owner to immediately contact every member of the House Agriculture
> and Rural Affairs Committee, well before Thursdays hearing.
> Please refer to House Bill 2525, and tell the legislators why you
> are opposed to this bill.
>
> Here is contact information for every member of the committee
>
> Rep. Arthur D. Hershey
>
> 717-783-6435
>
> 717-705-1868
>
> [email protected] <mailto:ahershey%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Michele Brooks
>
> 717-783-5008
>
> 717-705-1948
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mbrooks%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Timothy Joseph Solobay
>
> 717-787-1188
>
> 717-705-1887
>
> [email protected] <mailto:tsolobay%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Peter J. Daley II
>
> 717-783-9333
>
> 717-783-7558
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dzeiders%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Tim Mahoney
>
> 717-775-2174
>
> 717-780-4786
>
> [email protected] <mailto:tmahoney%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Bob Bastian
>
> 717-783-8756
>
> 717-783-3899
>
> [email protected] <mailto:bbastian%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Thomas F. Yewcic
>
> 717-783-0248
>
> 717-787-4922
>
> [email protected]et <mailto:tyewcic%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Gary Haluska
>
> 717-787-3532
>
> 717-783-7548
>
> [email protected] <mailto:ghaluska%40pahouse.net>
>
> Chairman Michael K. Hanna
>
> 717-772-2283
>
> 717-787-4137
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mhanna%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. H. Scott Conklin
>
> 717-787-9473
>
> 717-780-4764
>
> [email protected] <mailto:sconklin%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Mike Fleck
>
> 717-787-3335
>
> 717-260-6504
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mfleck%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Mark K. Keller
>
> 717-783-1593
>
> 717-705-7012
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mkeller%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Robert W. Kauffman
>
> 717-705-2004
>
> 717-705-1951
>
> [email protected] <mailto:rkauffma%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Dan Moul
>
> 717-783-5217
>
> None Given
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dmoul%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. P. Michael Sturla
>
> (717) 787-3555
>
> (717) 705-1923
>
> [email protected] <mailto:rep.mikesturla%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. David S. Hickernell
>
> 717-783-2076
>
> 717-705-1946
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dhickern%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Gordon R. Denlinger
>
> 717-787-3531
>
> 717-705-1951
>
> [email protected] <mailto:gdenling%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. David R. Millard
>
> 717-783-1102
>
> 717-772-0094
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dmillard%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Tina Pickett
>
> 717-783-8238
>
> 717-705-1949
>
> [email protected] <mailto:tpickett%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. Karen Boback
>
> 717-787-1117
>
> 717-705-1889
>
> [email protected] <mailto:kboback%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Mike Carroll
>
> 717-787-3589
>
> 717-780-4763
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mcarroll%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Jim Cox
>
> 717-772-2435
>
> 717-260-6516
>
> [email protected] <mailto:jcox%40pahousegop.com>
>
> Rep. David R. Kessler
>
> 717-787-2769
>
> 717-780-4768
>
> [email protected] <mailto:dkessler%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Richard T. Grucela
>
> 717-705-1878
>
> 717-783-3180
>
> [email protected] <mailto:rgrucela%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Babette Josephs
>
> 717-787-8529
>
> 717-787-5066
>
> [email protected] <mailto:RepJosephs%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Harold James
>
> 717-787-9477
>
> 717-787-7517
>
> [email protected] <mailto:hjames%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Frank Louis Oliver Sr.
>
> 717-787-3480
>
> 717-783-0684
>
> [email protected] <mailto:foliver%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Rosita C. Youngblood
>
> 717-787-7727
>
> 717-772-1313
>
> [email protected] <mailto:ryoungbl%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. John Myers
>
> 717-787-3181
>
> 717-772-4038
>
> [email protected] <mailto:jmyers%40pahouse.net>
>
> Rep. Mark B. Cohen
>
> 717-787-4117
>
> 717-787-6650
>
> [email protected] <mailto:mcohen%40pahouse.net>
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, hobby
> breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are
> used for hunting. We are a grassroots movement working to protect
> the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional
> relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place
> in American society and life. Please visit us on the web at
> http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org.
> <http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org.>
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we
> can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your
> membership, participation and support are truly essential to the
> success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of
> our members, and maintain strict independence.
>
> PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS
>
>
>
> The American Sporting Dog Alliance
> http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org
> <http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org>
>
