LOL Brady still stops in front of us (no biting)
hhe'll grow out of it eventually just say NO bites
hhe'll grow out of it eventually just say NO bites
I've had and fostered unruly Rottweilers, Cane Corsos, mutts of all walks, and GSDs.Originally Posted By: moribellewith a GS, it's been my experience that a "dominance" issue is arising.
your hubby may have to take puppy to the ground and lay on him once or twice.
my 5mo. old "ankle bit" me, and brought blood! I called the breeder, and sure enough, TAKE HIM DOWN! (I had to do it twice, then he understood he was second after me). Good luck!
No. It is a difference of knowledge, skill, and "enlightenment" on the part of the trainer. Most professional trainers have seen the light in terms of not only the fact that alpha rolling is unnecessary, but completely inappropriate behavior on the part of the owner, and a great way to cause severe damage to the dog/owner relationship. But of course, there are still a few hold outs who cling to these outdated methods of training and managing dogs.Originally Posted By: moribelleThe dominance training method used is done so by professional trainers worldwide. The ALPHA roll , as you put it, is used in the circle I travel in. Which stretches to Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, as well as in the US.
Perhaps it's a difference of K-9's vs. the more domestic types of GS's you seem to be dealing with. Are you familiar with the breeding of K-9'S?
Pretty normal puppy behavior. He wants to play, and since a pup's natural inclination is to play with people the same way he would with other dogs, that means biting and wrestling. Heck, our adult dogs often grab and chase at one another's feet when playing. You're feet are right there, and they're moving.. perfect target!Originally Posted By: Link's MomSo my 5 1/2 month old, Link has now decided that he should stop right infront of us when we are walking him and if you try to keep going he bites at our feet. It is very frustrating and annoying. We have tried saying "leave it" and using a negative marker (which we learnt in Puppy class). He doesn't do it on the whole walk only parts of it. We start a Level 1 Beginner Class on June 10th but was wondering if anyone had any suggestions in the mean time.
I love this response.Originally Posted By: Chris WildNo. It is a difference of knowledge, skill, and "enlightenment" on the part of the trainer. Most professional trainers have seen the light in terms of not only the fact that alpha rolling is unnecessary, but completely inappropriate behavior on the part of the owner, and a great way to cause severe damage to the dog/owner relationship. But of course, there are still a few hold outs who cling to these outdated methods of training and managing dogs.Originally Posted By: moribelleThe dominance training method used is done so by professional trainers worldwide. The ALPHA roll , as you put it, is used in the circle I travel in. Which stretches to Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, as well as in the US.
Perhaps it's a difference of K-9's vs. the more domestic types of GS's you seem to be dealing with. Are you familiar with the breeding of K-9'S?
Either way, it has everything to do with the trainer, and nothing to do with the type of dog.
The alpha roll is a technique developed decades ago, based upon research into wolf pack behavior which has since been proven to be erroneous. Wolves and dogs do NOT go around alpha rolling one another. The submissive animal will roll himself over to show submission. This is very different from the dominant one forcing a roll, which is what trainers who advocate this method do.
As far as dominance, it is a VERY rare dog (even in the hard, high drive "K9" types) who has such a dominant personality that it will challenge it's owner and needs constant rank adjustments and management. People seem very quick to jump on the "He's trying to dominate you!" bandwagon, when in 99% of the cases that is NOT what is happening.
Perfectly normal adolescent dog behavior is very often misinterpreted as dominance. And even in those cases where a dominance issue actually exists, it is very rarely a result of having a "dominant dog" and most often the result of the owner making huge mistakes in the raising and training of the dog, essentially eroding away their own dominance and leaving the dog in a state of confusion as to whether or not the owner is in charge, or is worthy of being in charge.
The vast majority of cases of rank problems with dogs are not because the dog WANTS to be in charge, but because he is receiving mixed signals from his owners about who is in charge. Placed in that situation, most dogs will try to pull rank. But this isn't because they want to, it's because a lack of leadership on the part of their owners forces them to. They do it because their natural need for a clear heirarchy is so strong that when placed in a situation where the heirarchy is unclear, trying to take over the top position is the only way for them to know who is in the top position. Very few dogs truly want that top position, but it is far more stressful for them to not know who has that position. They really just can't cope with a lack of clear heirarchy, and when the owner doesn't make that heiarchy clear, the dog has to do what he can to do it himself.
When this happens, it is a result of major relationship issues within the household and those stem from a lack of clear, consistent and fair leadership on the part of the humans involved. And the only way to fix it is to address those issues. An alpha roll isn't going to do it. What it is going to do is either get someone bit or, as happens in most cases, further damage the relationship.... destroying trust between dog and handler, and showing the dog that the human is even more unfit for leadership than the dog originally thought because good leaders worthy of following are consistent and firm, but also fair. They do not go around beating up their subordinates and forcing them into submission in inappropriate circumstances, which is exactly how a dog views an alpha roll.