This video has been around for quite some time and has made the rounds on this board many times. It is a depressing video.
I kind of agree that it was biased but I do believe that there was a method to the madness. I did find it to be quite revealing!I agree with agile, it was very biased. I saw most of it. In any sport there will be individuals who will do ANYTHING / sacrifice ANYTHING to get a higher placement.
I was on another forum years ago with someone who spent close to that in medical bills on her mixed breed from the shelter.I'm glad some saw the awakening of a desire for a better breeder/breed.i know that after this i have a new determination to be a better owner and possibly breeder for the future.i mean seeing an owner having to spend 40,000 just to keep her beloved pets alive.and the denial in the kennel club.
The breeders they found to interview.
I see a different story. Our shepherd club is mostly American line show dogs, though there are some of us Germans there. I often hear members of our group discussing health and temperament issues. This is somethin all reputable breeders are concerned with and working to improve.
That is another thing that this "documentary" left out. The extreme showline GSDs don't have much impact on the GSD breed as a whole. The majority of GSDs do not look like that and never will.This is true but I personally don't want the GSD turned into what was on that video......if they do, I will ...........own a goldfish or something![]()
the way some people think thats whats going to happen.i see extremisim in the americans too.look whats happened to the americanized boxer.gotta be taller,longer,flashier ect ect.now their eyes have pouched to the point they have to be surgically cut and stitched sometimes.cardio is off the scales.alot of people say the american shepherd is not in danger like the german......yea they may not have the roach but the ass end is getting awfully low and weak.i mean go and find the original standard of the gsd and it does not look anything like what we have today.its not hard to see.you just have to want to see it is all.this is true but i personally don't want the gsd turned into what was on that video......if they do, i will ...........own a goldfish or something![]()
everywhere i look i see just that.low,low,low.i think that it has an extreme impact because we are lead to believe that a breeder has the best wether this is true or not.we are lead to believe that anything but a breeder who shows is the right way to go.its flashy and glamourus and the dogs look so elegant yada,yada.people get sucked in.and most people that do are not really informed either.like the uk is trying to do, there should be better restrictions on who should breed and who shouldn't and that goes for both breeder and dog.i know that will piss off alot of breeders but the ones who get angry are the one who have something to hide.if they are honest about what they are breeding and have a true plan as to how to improve the breed rather than take away then that should be the way of it.i mean there is a crisis of unwanted pets.maybe this should be the time to make a logical call on who should be able to breed and make them prove it with health testing forefront and foremost.i dare say a goodly amount of unwanted dogs and cats would be cut in half if not more.if there are laws in place, many people will not want to break them.i think this will protect the animals as well as future owners.that is another thing that this "documentary" left out. The extreme showline gsds don't have much impact on the gsd breed as a whole. The majority of gsds do not look like that and never will.
thats just it,its a paper trail to no where.its ink on parchment and thats it.if there was honesty behind it thats one thing.honesty is sorely lacking nowadays and papers or no,health records and testing is what needs to be boasted about not i paid $2000 for a mutant that cannot reproduce without a lift,or i have to have my young surgically cut out of me because my puppies heads are so gruesomely massive they cannot fit through a black hole and i will cost you tens of thousands in vet bills just to keep me breathing.these dogs cannot help it but they are seriously ugly.they have no function anymore rather it be the intended use or companion.you'll have to tell this woman that $2000 is the least she'll be paying in the next couple of years for that dog.yea,$2000 of severe inbreeding and gentetic deffects.good for her.i watched this show finally. It makes me laugh at some of the breeder's that brush off scientific facts about the genetic disabilities of the dogs. The show honestly scarred me. The most drastic change of dog i noticed was the english bulldog. I know on a debate site i'm on a lady was talking how she paid 2,000 dollars for her english bulldog and it it's descendants had all kind of titles. Now after watching that i wonder just how many health problems her dog has.
I find your posts extremely hard to read because of the punctuation and lack of capitol letters. I was able to get this far though...everywhere i look i see just that.low,low,low.i think that it has an extreme impact because we are lead to believe that a breeder has the best wether this is true or not.we are lead to believe that anything but a breeder who shows is the right way to go.its flashy and glamourus and the dogs look so elegant yada,yada.
You do realize though that the show featured nothing but worst case scenarios and clever editing right? That because Bulldogs have reproductive issues and no longer have useful function, doesn't mean that is the case with all breeds?I watched this show finally. It makes me laugh at some of the breeder's that brush off scientific facts about the genetic disabilities of the dogs. The show honestly scarred me.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with UKC and CKC? The documentary was in England, CKC is in Canada and UKC is US and I believe, Canada.Biased or not I don't think that matters; I think what matters is that even if it's the MINORITY of show breeders who have such disregard for their breed it is still astonishing. And the Kennel Club's negligence is undeniable. They can become as strict as they want and breeder's aren't going to leave because there is no other big name club to register dogs through--most of those pompous breeders wouldn't be caught dead trying to sell "champion lines" as a member of the UKC or CKC or something haha.
Yeah, I realize, but it's hard to get past the part where they want to say there is not enough scientific evidence about genetic disabilities in the dogs. How about judges stick with judging and scientific facts will always overrule a judge that judges on just beauty.You do realize though that the show featured nothing but worst case scenarios and clever editing right? That because Bulldogs have reproductive issues and no longer have useful function, doesn't mean that is the case with all breeds?