Pretty puppy. It's kind of hard to tell. She looks like short to medium with a very shiny coat. But then, pictures can be deceiving.
Not necessarily. The only way you would know is if the parents have produced coated puppies before. But just becuse they HAVEN'T had any in the past doesn't necessarily mean that they won't in the future. (This is assuming that the parents both have "normal" coats.)Originally Posted By: JeanKBBMMMAANIs there some kind of gene for that kind of thing where you could know from the parents, etc. if it were possible?
(I hope that is not a really dumb question!)
ETA-probably is!
![]()
So they could ask the breeder about the possibility from past litters.Originally Posted By: BlackGSDNot necessarily. The only way you would know is if the parents have produced coated puppies before. But just becuse they HAVEN'T had any in the past doesn't necessarily mean that they won't in the future. (This is assuming that the parents both have "normal" coats.)Originally Posted By: JeanKBBMMMAANIs there some kind of gene for that kind of thing where you could know from the parents, etc. if it were possible?
(I hope that is not a really dumb question!)
ETA-probably is!
![]()
I checked the pedigree and there doesnt seem to be any LH in there. But thats just going my pictures and not all pics are available for all the dogs in the ped so there could be one. Also I believe its possible to still have dogs in the lineage that could be carriers and still pass this trait along right?Originally Posted By: TRITONHe doesn't look like one so much in the head shot because his ears don't look to have tufts. I think he does in the stacked shot though. Do you know if either parents carry the recessive for coats?
I love the first pic, it looks like a tiny person is in a bouncy chair and is just about to get an ear![]()