Not trying to change his/her mind at all I just don't want the OP to get the wrong idea. All dogs react to all foods differently, but common sense should tell someone the higher quality the ingredients the more receptive the body will be to the food- thats all;
0
You are making assumptions about the quality of the ingredients in Orijen and you are also making assumptions that many of the ingredients in Orijen actually benefit the dogs, like flowers and herbs.
You would be suprised of the commonality of the quality of the ingredients used in petfoods. So many things are now standardized that the only edge is "feel good" marketing and packaging. Even things like a vacuum foil bag influence consumers to think the food is superior to a food in a paper bag.
The hysteria over grains is even more intriguing, as potato is pure garbage compared to brown rice and whole corn.
I am not suggesting that people use Ole Roy, but you will see no difference in
your dog if you feed Kirkland or Orijen.
The industry responds to consumer wants but if you ask them they would rather use a mix of whole, properly prepared, grains over potatoes.
The other scam is using fresh meat. Pure marketing.
You say it is effective. In terms of what? After spending all that money for food, of course people will say it is effective. That is human nature. Scientists including vets and nutritionists can find no basis for any of these assertions.
Do people even realize that confirmed food allergies in dogs are less than 10% of all allergies??? Not grains causing it either.