Lawsuit Filed Against Acana and Orijen - German Shepherd Dog Forums
 34Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-19-2018, 10:23 PM Thread Starter
Crowned Member
 
Momto2GSDs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,534
Lawsuit Filed Against Acana and Orijen

Consumers in Minnesota, California and Florida are suing Champion Pet Food for “False Advertising”, violations of “feed law”, and numerous other charges. The lawsuit includes results of heavy metal testing and includes results that this dry dog food contains BPA – a chemical typically not associated with dry/kibble pet foods.

This is a Class Action lawsuit – currently representing consumers in Minnesota, California and Florida. The consumers are suing Champion Pet Food “for their negligent, reckless, and/or intentional practice of misrepresenting and failing to fully disclose the presence of heavy metals and toxins in their pet food sold throughout the United States. Plaintiffs seek both injunctive and monetary relief on behalf of the proposed Classes (defined below), including requiring full disclosure of all such substances in its marketing, advertising, and labeling and restoring monies to the members of the proposed Classes.”


The lawsuit claims Champion pet foods (Acana and Orijen) “contain levels of arsenic, mercury, lead, cadmium” “known to pose health risks to humans and animals, including dogs” and interestingly for a kibble pet food…the lawsuit claims the dry pet food contained “BISPHENOL A (“BPA”)”.

https://truthaboutpetfood.com/lawsui...na-and-orijen/




Momto2GSDs is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 12:33 AM
Crowned Member
 
wolfy dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 9,342
Good heavens, I just bought a bag Acana for Deja. I am not in one of the states, mentioned in the lawsuit. This is going to hurt them.
wolfy dog is offline  
post #3 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 01:17 AM
Crowned Member
 
Sabis mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,533
I give up! I will simply buy 6 month supplies of First Mate. I have spent weeks switching Shadow over to Acana, after who knows how long researching and comparing.
One of my big concerns is that with an iffy immune system and allergies and a bad heart, I was not willing to risk recall issues.
These dog food companies are really getting on my last nerve.
das1 likes this.
Sabis mom is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 06:01 AM
Crowned Member
 
GatorBytes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 5,167
@Sabis mom
Champion opened a manufacturing facility in Kentucky (I think) to support the demand for the US market. I believe there has already been some issues with product from that facility. Although I don't know for sure, the Canadian market hasn't had issues.
Maybe email them and ask what the heck this is about.
Like with all pet food processing plants, there are more than one brand of food going through the plant.
My friends daughter worked at a pet food/canning place in Ontario that did dog and cat food from the bottom of the barrel foods you have never seen on a shelf here anywhere (shipped who knows where) containing mystery meat to "Wellness"
As a far as I knew Champion is independent from other processing plants here, but in the US...???
carmspack and Sabis mom like this.

He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion. - Unknown
GatorBytes is offline  
post #5 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 09:39 AM
Member
 
RoseW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 85
Looks like Champion published a response on their website and on the Facebook pages for the diets.

Rose
RoseW is offline  
post #6 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 09:49 AM Thread Starter
Crowned Member
 
Momto2GSDs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,534


Face Book

Dear Fellow Pet Lovers,
The allegations contained within a Class Action Complaint that was brought against us on March 1st are meritless and based on misinterpretation of the data.
Let us assure you that our products are safe and that we systematically test our products at two third-party laboratories using the Official Methods of Analysis by Association of Analytical Communities (AOAC). While we plan to comprehensively refute the wide range of false allegations in a court of law at the appropriate date, in the interim we want you to be confident in the safety and quality of our products.
For more information, we urge you to read: ORIJEN and ACANA Foods in Comparison to Pet Food Safety Standards, here: http://bit.ly/2HMvJiy
As you know, our commitment to using fresh and raw meat and fish ingredients means that pets and Pet Lovers can count on Champion to provide safe, Biologically Appropriate™ nutrition. Much like the natural human food we consume, Champion Petfoods contains small traces of a range of naturally occurring elements. These so-called ‘heavy metals’ are found throughout the Earth’s environment, and the miniscule amounts of these substances found in Champion Petfoods are a safe and common component of both human and animal diets. Our Biologically Appropriate™ foods feature much higher levels of quality fresh and raw meat ingredients than conventional pet foods, including fish and seafood ingredients.
Please know that we are confident that we will prevail as the facts and evidence are presented to the court, and that these baseless claims will not deter us from our mission of delivering award-winning Biologically Appropriate™ foods. The legal complaint has no bearing whatsoever on the activities or operation of our business, and you will continue to enjoy the same high degree of professionalism and quality you have come to expect from Champion.
Thank you for your continued commitment to our company and our quality food products.
Champion Petfoods

Last edited by Momto2GSDs; 03-20-2018 at 09:52 AM.
Momto2GSDs is offline  
post #7 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 09:52 AM
Member
 
btfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Illinois
Posts: 98
BPA is a chemical used in the plastics manufacturing process that basically keeps the plastic "flexible". It lost a lot of favor in the container industry after it was found to have leached out of the plastic's matrix and was being consumed. Furthermore, BPA bio-accumulates. There have been studies showing BPA in the systems of newborns because the bioaccumulation has passed from mother to child. Think about that: babies are being born with BPA already in their bodies! And no one really knows what the long term effects of BPA consumption are, but I'd bet they're not rosy and good.

I worked in the glass container industry for a number of years, so I'm intimately familiar with the ins and outs of our competition in the marketplace. That said, most plastic containers - water bottles, drink bottles, food jars, etc - have went away from BPA, but I'm sure there are some that still use it for some things. It's weird that it would be in dog food though. Maybe it's leaching from packaging or an ingredient's packaging?
carmspack, Sabis mom and CometDog like this.
btfloyd is offline  
post #8 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 10:11 AM
Elite Member
 
Muskeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mountains
Posts: 1,734
Just remember anyone can file a lawsuit, it doesn't mean they have valid claims. That's for the courts to decide... unfortunately, it takes a lot of $$$ to fight a lawsuit, even if invalid.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Muskeg is offline  
post #9 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 10:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Tr@ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: LonG Island, New Yawk
Posts: 307
I'm glad to see they've responded to the allegations of having unsafe food, and if the tests they do are industry-standard, then I hope they'll consider counter-suing or, at least, not agree to settle. Frivolous lawsuits just raise costs for everyone. Standards have been established for acceptable limits of certain elements in foods, and this is not only because it's often impossible to remove all traces of said elements, but also because most generally-accepted test methods cannot detect amounts of As, Cr, Hg, etc below a certain level.

I find the hysteria especially annoying considering how much sugar people eat. Talk about poison! Sugar is terrible and leads to all kinds of disease, yet it's contained in nearly everything.

The dog food companies won't knowingly endanger pets to save money, because doing so would be bad PR and lead to losses of revenue and consumer trust. Pet products are a huge market, and while it's always a good idea for pet owners to do their own research, sometimes they need a little background in science to get the most (and most correct information) out of what's made available.
carmspack, Momto2GSDs and Femfa like this.
post #10 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-20-2018, 10:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Tr@ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: LonG Island, New Yawk
Posts: 307
Perspective, part II

Don't forget, consumers in California have cancer warning labels on EVERYTHING.

"Acrylamide is the chemical over which the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT), a non-profit organization, is suing. Specifically, CERT is suing coffee sellers like Starbucks and 7-Eleven. The lawsuit claims that because a chemical called acrylamide can be produced when coffee beans are roasted, stores that sell coffee should have to post a Proposition 65 warning. A ruling is expected soon, the Wall Street Journal reported." Here's Why Everything Gives You Cancer In California

How much does it cost annually for a company to print compliant labels on its products? All of its products? And how much does it cost annually for that company to hire personnel to interpret new regulations and put them into effect, and to respond to state audits ensuring continued compliance? And more importantly, when the consumers get passed these cost increases, is that cost worth it considering the actual (not the perceived) risk of using the product?

I'm all for safety. But I'm not for figuratively wrapping folks in legislative bubble wrap (it's got BPA!) and giving them a private air supply (It's got di-hydrogen monoxide!).

IMO, we'd all be better off as a society if we taught two things in schools (in addition to the basics): ethics, and risk assessment.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the German Shepherd Dog Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome