|
Food For Thought
By T. J. Dunn Jr., D.V.M.
Director of Veterinary Services
PetFoodDirect.com
Published in April, 1995, Dog
World Magazine
After seven years of college study preparing to be a veterinarian and 25
years of practical experience with pets, I am still amazed and slightly
shocked on a daily basis. These shocks usually result from conversations with
pet owners when I inquire, "And what do you feed your pet?" and the
reply, "Oh, whatever's on sale."
The
numbers of dog and cat patients veterinarians treat that are suffering from
nutrition-related disorders is way out of proportion to what might be
expected. With the advanced knowledge of pet nutrition readily available to
every pet owner, there really is no excuse for the large numbers of cats and
dogs afflicted with nutrition-related problems.
In my experience, the most common identifying sign of poor nutritional
status in my patients has been dry, flaky skin and sparse, coarse, brittle
hair coat. Contrast this image to a pet that has a full, shiny, soft coat with
healthy-looking skin. It doesn't require any special education to observe your
pet and simply decide if the skin and coat are healthy-looking. If they
aren't you must evaluate what you are feeding before you do anything else.
Other factors such as skin mites (mange), allergies, autoimmune disorders,
genetic defects and bacterial/fungal infections will certainly damage the skin
and coat. These disorders must be diagnosed by your veterinarian, but
remember, any treatment will be less effective (and possibly ineffective) if
the pet lacks basic nutritive input.
Studies indicate that as many as 60 percent of pets in America are
overweight. Simply put, they are taking in more calories than they are burning
off through physical activity. Believe it or not, an overweight pet can still
be malnourished, and often is!
A diet may be too high in calories and yet too low in essential amino acids
(protein), essential fatty acids, vitamins or minerals. Overweight pets that
are put on low-calorie reducing diets are at even greater risk of
malnourishment due to lower nutritional density of food consumed and the
resultant reduction of nutrients they do need.
I have a question. Why is it that for so many pet
owners the first place to "skimp" and "economize" is in
the price they'll pay for pet food? The "whatever's on sale" mindset
shows either a lack of understanding of good pet nutrition or a pathetic
disregard for the health of the animals in their care. You can skimp or cut
corners on other nonessential things, or have fewer pets, but to skimp on your
pet's daily source of life-giving sustenance is inexcusable.
I am going to assume that many pet owners simply have not been properly
informed of the fundamental role good nutrition plays in the optimal health of
their pet. The reason for this lack of knowledge is due to two factors--both
correctable.
Factor 1 Less-than-aggressive
informational input by some pet health professionals. Veterinarians, groomers,
breeders, kennel operators and pet store owners must do a better job of
informing the pet-owning public about the good brands of pet foods available
and the need to avoid the generic, cheap imitations so often chosen by pet
owners.
At the same time, pet owners should be willing to trust the pet
professionals' advice. Often pet professionals are not taken seriously, since
many pet owners believe we're only trying to "sell 'em something."
There's a built-in resistance to spend more money on a quality food because
the pet owner perceives a profit motive driving the pet professional's advice.
The pet professional must, therefore, not sell the product, but rather
knowledgeably explain to and inform the pet owner of the advantage to the pet
of a higher-quality food. The food will then sell itself! The pet will look
and feel better; the customer will see the results and return to purchase more
of the higher-quality food.
Factor II Ambiguous labeling of
pet food products. Some pet food producers use eye-catching,
confidence-building descriptives that give insufficient information about the
type and quality of the ingredients in the food. As a pet food purchaser you
should ask yourself what these descriptions really mean. Their intention may
be to have you believe you are purchasing a good-quality product, when in fact
what is in the can or bag may only contain digestible nutrients sufficient to
meet minimum nutritional requirements for an average dog or cat.
What if your pet isn't average? Then you may see evidence of nutritional
inadequacies such as poor weight maintenance, dry, flaky, itchy skin and
brittle, coarse hair. Regardless of what "eye-catching" descriptions
are used on the label, you must look at each pet to see how the diet performs
for that individual.
Let us start right now to intelligently assess what we're calling pet food
and to recognize how a good quality pet food with promote a quality life
experience for our pets.
I'll share with you some basic concepts I've learned through more than 25
years of hands-on veterinary practice. These basic observations of pet health
as it is influenced by nutrition have been sharpened by my own critical view
of sales reps' high-pressure tactics, sweeping generalizations and outright
misrepresentations. Not being content to accept claims or hype regarding
the multitude of products thrown at the customer, I've always demanded to see
some facts. Quite honestly, facts are often lacking, generalizations abound
and critical analysis of "standards" are still missing. Keep the
following concepts in mind the next time you reach for your pet's "daily
bread."
1. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.
This concept is based on the inescapable fact that the higher the cost of
the food's ingredients, the easier they are for the pet to digest and use for
biochemical processes. For example, egg whites are highly digestible and have
excellent nutritive value, but they are expensive. Therefore, most pet
foods don't contain egg whites. Corn and soy bean meal, on the other hand,
provide only marginal nourishment for dogs and cats and are relatively
inexpensive. Not surprisingly, they are often the foundation for many pet food
diets! The pet food industry is well aware of the cost-conscious consumer;
anything to keep that bag or can of food less expensive to produce is of
paramount importance. So remember, in general, the higher the price, the
better the quality and digestibility of the ingredients.
It is a fact that a pet consuming a highly
digestible food will require less of this food than if consuming a poorly
digestible food. Another way to state this is: To maintain a certain level of
health, a pet needs to eat more pounds of cheap food than expensive food. If
you feed more cheap food, you'll certainly have to buy more (and have more
fecal waste!), so is the consumer really saving money on this kind of program?
(Study Table 1. It's a good, simple guide.)
2. A BRAND OF FOOD YOU'VE "ALWAYS FED" MAY NOT BE SO
GOOD!
While discussing diet with pet owners and upon making the recommendation to
change to a better product, I'm often hit with the statement, "But Doc,
I've always fed XYZ Brand to my dogs and they've all done just fine." If
an individual is resistant to discovering something new or better, or ways to
improve on obvious deficiencies, there's really no point in talking any
further. This pet owner hasn't given himself or herself a chance to see that
there can be a difference in how the pet looks and acts! All the person sees
is what he or she has always seen and observes to be normal and will never
have anything better to compare it to. I'm tempted to ask this person,
"If you've always ridden a horse to get you around, would you not drive a
car simply because a horse has always worked out OK?"
|
TABLE 1
|
|
Good Quality Food
|
Average Quality Food
|
| 1.Main ingredients-meat, lamb, fish, chicken |
1. Main ingredient-corn, wheat, rice, soybean meal |
| 2. Higher purchase price |
2. Low purchase price |
| 3. High digestibility |
3. Inefficient digestibility |
| 4. Low fecal waste |
4. Lots of clean-up required |
| 5. Less required by pet to maintain health |
5. More required to maintain health |
| 6. Usually doesn't have dyes to enhance its appearance and is
not promoted through ambiguous claims |
6. Often promoted as "looks like" real meat or cheese,
contains food dyes with interesting colors |
3. LOOK AT THE INGREDIENTS.
This is your best guide to the quality of the
food. By law, every bag or can of pet food must list the ingredients in
descending order according to weight. This means the major ingredient is
listed first, then the second most prominent and so on. Personally, I'd rather
see meat by-products, lamb, fish meal or chicken listed first than corn, and
I'd also expect to pay more than for the corn diet. Per pound of food, my pet
will derive more benefit from the meat-based diet than the vegetable-based
diet. Dogs and cats may be "domesticated" behaviorally, but we
humans cannot do a quick digestive fix on creatures whose physiology and
anatomy have evolved over millions of years and based upon predator-prey
(carnivorous) food acquisition. Sure, it would be more convenient for us if
our pets were herbivores - but let's quit pretending that our pets are
primarily plant eaters simply because it would be easier and less expensive
for us if they were.
4. IF IT SAYS 'HIGH PROTEIN' ON THE LABEL, IT MUST BE HIGH
QUALITY.
The high-protein label means absolutely nothing,
but it sure sells a lot of food for the manufacturer! I could put together a
high-protein diet for pets that provides no nutritive value whatsoever -
they'd die of malnutrition in a month!
What you need to know about the protein in pet food is the source of the
protein. Guess what? Feathers, cow hoofs, leather (rawhide), hair and beaks
are mostly protein, but as a food source they are not very digestible. Cows
and horses do utilize corn and other plant material quite well, partially due
to their relatively long digestive tracts and extended time it takes the
ingested food to transit the digestive tract. Meat-eaters (dogs and cats) do
not digest corn, soybean meal and other vegetable sources of protein very well
due in part to their relatively short intestinal tracts and fast transit
times. In addition, the dog and cat pancreas (a gland absolutely essential for
digestion) does not secrete any enzymes to break down plant cellulose for
carbohydrate utilization.
Think about this for a moment. If your dog or cat was lost and on its
own looking for food, would you ever find it out in a corn or soybean field
foraging for an easy meal? Of course not. A dog or cat would starve to death
in a corn field! Why, then, do we insist on feeding our pets diets that are
composed mostly of corn, soybeans, wheat, barley or rice? It defies common
sense as well as biological sense.
Don't misunderstand me, I am not saying that grains such as corn, beans,
rice, barley and fiber fillers such as beet pulp and ground peanut hulls are
bad for dogs and cats. In the correct amounts and combinations they can play a
role in good pet nutrition. However, I am saying that just because grains are
cheap, easy to wrap a label around, store conveniently and don't need
refrigeration, they should not be the foundation for a diet formulated for
creatures that are primarily meat-eaters!
Here's how to tell what protein is OK to feed and what sources are poor
quality for dogs and cats. Keep Table 2 with you and do a little research by
cruising the labels of pet foods. Remember Factor 1 - the higher the quality
of digestibility, the higher the price.
Digestibility, as it relates to protein, is the measure of how well the
animal can break the unabsorbable large protein molecules into smaller,
absorbable amino acids in the intestine. There are numerous types of amino
acids, some of which are essential for good health; egg whites have lots of
different amino acids and corn only a few. For the dog or cat, egg whites are
about the best source of easily digestible protein, so egg whites are given a
value of 1.0 on the digestibility scale. Table 2 shows how other proteins
stack up to eggs for digestibility.
You can see from the rankings in this table which protein sources provide
the best digestibility. Now you should be thinking, "If a product is
labeled high protein, so what?" You want to know the source of the
protein by looking at the ingredient list on the bag or can of food. And take
a close look at CORN as a protein source! CORN is primarily a
carbohydrate source and has limited value as a source of protein because of
its limited amino acid content. CORN cannot be considered a good source
of protein in spite of what many pet food manufacturers would like the
consumer to believe!
Protein Digestibility List
These values are approximate and were taken from various
nutrition sources and from personal communication with nutrition experts.
|
TABLE 2
|
| Egg Whites |
1.0 |
| Muscle Meats (Poultry, Beef, Lamb) |
.92 |
Organ Meats (kidney, liver, heart)
meat by-products |
.90 |
| Milk, Cheese |
.89 |
| Fish |
.75 |
| Soy |
.75 |
| Rice |
.72 |
| Oats |
.66 |
| Yeast |
.63 |
| Wheat |
.60 |
| Corn |
.54 |
5. JUST BECAUSE YOUR PET LOVES THE FOOD YOU'RE FEEDING DOES NOT
PROVE THE FOOD IS HIGHLY NOURISHING.
Give a child a choice and his or her diet would consist of fries and
chocolate malts. Give your pet a choice and the diet quality may not be
optimal either. You must choose wisely and provide responsibly a diet that
will promote optimal health, not just barely meet minimum or
"average" requirements. Most cheap pet foods were deliberately
formulated to just barely meet a dog's minimum nutritional requirements.
Pet owners have an obligation to provide their pets with reasonably
adequate food, water and shelter. So, equipped with your knowledge of basic
nutrition, to feed a poor quality diet is plain and simply unfair to your pet.
Keep in mind that if your pet gulps down its food ravenously, it may be doing
so because it needs more than what it's been getting. It doesn't mean that
it's a great food because the pet eats it so well.
In my opinion:
Of the literally hundreds of brands of pet foods available to the consumer,
there are a limited number which approach what I would call "good
quality". These have as their foundation (first or second ingredient)
meat, lamb, fish or chicken. Also, meat by-products are especially beneficial
to pets. Meat by-products, according to the definition established by the
Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO), do not contain hair,
horns, teeth or hoofs but do include organ tissue such as liver, kidneys,
heart, blood and lungs.
These diets that contain meat or fish protein as their foundation will be
superior to vegetable-based feeds in their life-giving nourishment for our dog
and cat friends. And all you have to do is read the label!
It is my contention that many brands of pet foods are woefully
overrated in their ability to properly nourish dogs and cats. Often these
foods are purposely designed to meet minimum standards for health maintenance.
Our pets are the innocent victims of a pet food industry that is resistant to
change what for the industry is a good thing - cheap products that sell. Do
you want proof of my contention?
Well,
the best objective proof lies in the fact that multi-millions of dollars are
spent by pet owners on supplements such as vitamins, omega fatty acids,
digestive enzymes, zinc, fiber and other nutrients to correct deficiencies in
their pets' health. A really good diet requires no supplementing and in fact
should not be supplemented.
For subjective proof ask any veterinarian why so many patients are
obese or suffering from dry, itchy, flaky skin and poor coats. Why are there
so many "allergic dermatitis" cases? Why are so many dogs eating
ravenously and yet are thin and cannot maintain weight properly? Perhaps being
fed "whatever's on sale" has something to do with it.
If pet health professionals would do a little better job of stressing the
importance - no, the necessity - of optimum nutrition, and if pet food
purchasers would be a little less price conscious and a little more
discriminating when they make that purchase decision, then a multitude of
minimally nourishing pet foods would no longer be available to consumers.
|