R+ Training: Using the highest reinforcement

[qbchottu]

He is not playing and he is not considering the smell the reward. If you look at the female, you see her standing nicely and she is flagging quite a bit as well. She is ready and welcoming him. He is excited, concentrating on her, play bowing, excited, primed and ready to breed her. The smell is not the reward. It is the lure to get him to concentrate, but he does not ever get the reward. True reward in this case is to breed the female. Otherwise, why don't all trainers bottle up some "doggie love scent" and use it to train all their competition males? (speaking of - this might actually be a good money making scheme!) I would not feel right about doing this type of "reward" training. It is fine to use females in heat to proof or add distractions *after* training is completed sufficiently. But this is not reward to me. It is an unfair lure - a proverbial laser pointer.

[Rerun]

Scent is actually not foreign to humans at all, it's a natural physical response for humans as well, but since this is a family friendly forum perhaps it's best not to get into the details.

There are a few issues here that people are disagreeing on. you think it's ok to use a bitch in heat as the reward, some of us don't. I don't have a problem at all with positive training, but I do think it's wrong to expect the female to put up with that behavior. They are very lucky they have such a patient calm female, because not all would put up with that - even in heat. I personally don't agree with using another dog as the reward, regardless of the reasons. The dog responded fine with the ball/tug toy, and was still working great, excited to do the contact exercise again, and then they used the other dog. I really don't see a reward occuring at all. When the dog loses focus, the handler let him run over to the female as an outlet.

The dog certainly isn't going to be able to do this in a show, so I really don't see why they would bother using this as the reward for performance, what do they expect to happen when he's off lead and a dog in heat is around at the show? Without that leash on, it doesn't look like there is a lot of control occuring around that female. You have to start somewhere of course, but this doesn't seem like a situation where the dog is going to improve if they keep allowing him to run over to her. Seems like the point of redirection would be to redirect his focus back on the handler, not keep not allowing him to focus on the female. Even during the contact exercise, they had the female parked in front of him and he could see her and just run straight to her. His focus was not on the handler or exercise. It was on the dog in heat in front of him.

[JeanKBBMMMAAN]

Yes.

Just because you CAN use/do something, doesn't mean you SHOULD.

[G-burg]

I'm just amazed at what people make videos of...

I don't agree with what's being done either.. but then again, I'm not a great dog trainer!!

[ShatteringGlass]

I'll stick to food, toys and praise...

[codmaster]

Heh! Heh!


Interesting approach!

[GSDElsa]

IMO this should be "Postitive Reinforcement at it's Worst."

Oy vey.

[KristiM]

I can see both sides of the argument here. I however DO think what she did worked out successfully for THAT particular dog just because of the fact that he went from absolutely no interest in his toy to being able to play with it as a reward. This scenario I think could be considered a relative success, but what happens if there is a female at a show that he can't sniff because she will rip his face off (or the owner won't allow it.) You obviously would have to train and prepare for those situations, using whatever worked for you and your dog.

[dOg]

Seems like trying to make lemonade out of lemons to me. Interesting what we'll do when the conditions present themselves. He was loading out of control and this did internalize it, so it was making the best of a silly situation, at best.

[Jack's Dad]

I think it's kinda sick.