|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Greene County, NY
Posts: 776
|
I'm not a breeder, and not even entertaining the idea at this point, I'm just curious about this. If you are a breeder, or plan to become one, what do you consider to be of more value, a conformation or a Schutzhund title, and why? I know there are different lines and purposes, so people are breeding for different things, I'm just interested to see what people have to say. Sorry if this is a silly question!
__________________
~Stephanie Alexa (04/25/09) Princess (GSD/Pit Rescue) October 1996-September 2004 [img]/forum/images/graemlin/rip.gif[/img] |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator who has gone to the dogs
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Where I don't wanna be-NW PA
Posts: 14,645
|
Personally I like the idea of both because you need both to produce the total package which is what the German Shepherd Dog is supposed to be.
That said I think the working temperament is more important to be judged by an independent third party. Structure can be seen pretty much by any one who can interpret the standard. NOT saying that conformation is not AS important but if I had to pick one over the other it would be SCH. Nerve, temperament and working ability is best tested by an independent and objective party.
__________________
Ruq Paq
Lakota, Chimo, Tika, Rayne, Kanuck, Jethro and Keyzah My Angels forever in my heart and watching over us: Phoenix 9/07 Kaylee Cheyenne 5/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
"I like Daffy" Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Douglas, IL ( near St. Louis)
Posts: 2,435
|
I want it all!
__________________
Daphne and the Gang at Andaka Where Beauty and Brains Come Together http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/germ...&results_in=10 Home of Ch Natty; Ch Doll; Jag RA (ch ptd); Sara RN (ch ptd); Bella (the new one); and Fisher (Mr. Evil) At the Bridge: Ch Kahla CD; Ch Keno UD HSAs OA; Ch Kizzy HSAs RE; Ch Tag CD RAE2; Ch Pharra; Bee PT; Ch Red the Dachshund |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Alpha Bitch of the Wild Bunch
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 12,604
|
IMO, anything that tests temperament is more important than that which tests structure. While certainly both are important, temperament is of the utmost importance to me. A dog who is a less than ideal representative of the breed from a structural perspective can still have many, many uses from companion to working dog. A dog with faulty temperament can be a heartbreak, or dangerous liability, to anyone and everyone.
__________________
Wildhaus Kennels Kaiser ~ SchH3 CGC TDI (HOT) Raven ~ SchH3 AWD2 PD1 P1 PA T1 UCD URO2 CGC TT (B/HOT) Della ~ SchHA TR1 PD1 P1 PA T1 URO2 CGC TT (B/HOT) Wulf ~ SchH1 PD1 P1 T1 URO2 CGC TT (B/HOT) Heidi ~ BH CD UCD RN URO1 (B/HOT) Jazz ~ Superpup In Training |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & LOTR Addict
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 11,698
|
Quote:
From a working dog standpoint structure is also important. Not show dog structure, but sound working structure. A dog that is built incorrectly will not hold up for a long working career. We need to look at both.
__________________
Lisa Clark Zu Treuen Händen Working German Shepherd Dogs South Michigan SchH and Police Club |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 660
|
I am not a breeder but I would much rather prefer a sound dog over a conformational one.
__________________
Marie Catja Z Elbu (PPD) BH CGC (DOB 1/26/06) GSD Kaiyah Vom Draufganger BH TR1 CGC (DOB 5/6/08) GSD Quest Vom Spartanville (DOB 1/31/09) SCH2 BH TR1 CGC GSD Ara od Bartika (DOB Apr 2, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Saugus, CA
Posts: 1,887
|
Quote:
![]() I have to have a dog that looks like a German Shepherd. To me, structure matters and you can have both without losing working ability. What I do find disturbing is the working lines who are starting to look like the modern show dogs. Sorry, that structure is not correct, even if it is a working line dog. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Valdivia, Chile
Posts: 4,276
|
Quote:
__________________
"The dog does not need to be deranked so much as the people need to learn to act like people worth listening to" Suzanne Clothier. Diabla, my Daemon; SchH A, RH-T A Akela, my Direwolf; Work in Progress Bagheera, Long term puppy host |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 7,089
|
FUNCTIONAL is the key word in defining Structure to me, not FASHION.
I come from horses. Conformation is oft over-exaggerated in horses, lending itself to new problems, both in health and performance - QH are the most widely bred in the US for example - conformation breeding and line breeding/inbreeding has led to navicular and HYPP in QH - conformation horses are not functional, they cannot rein or cut cows as they cannot MOVE correctly for those endeavours. This all translates to dogs as well. I look at breeding as a triangle of priorities - you must have all three or have not bred correctly: Temperament (includes nerves, social and environmental soundness) Drive Functional structure (including health ie hips) These three must be in balance - a dog with 2 of the three cannot perform satisfactorily in all areas. Lee
__________________
Csabre Sch1, Hexe Sch2, Bengal, Kyra, Kira & Kougar v Wolfstraum ~ Basha Sch3, Ghost Sch3 - Danger Sch1 SAR - ATB/Ret - Kyra, Sch3, Alice Sch1, Kelsey, Fenja Sch3 wolfstraum.net |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |