|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 16,235
|
I'm guessing because their are no testicles, so easier for both? I have a long coated, THICK coated mixed dog that is neutered and thank heavens because when I do his sani-trim I am literally just poking my scissors into gobs of fur and cutting (once I get the majority of the hair off, then I clean it up and brush). There's no way I could trim him the same way if he were not neutered. I would have castrated him the first time!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,393
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 11,005
|
No, the ones we've had were, as best I can remember, a Border collie, Golden Retriever, a Golden lab, a Pointer, a Min Pin and some Chihuahuas; there's been a few others but every time we've had an intact senior, and I'm guessing, 10-12yrs., they've had reproductive tract (or mammary) cancers.
That's not to say spayed/neutered seniors are more 'healthy' per se, but they don't have reproductive tract cancers and their issues were less "severe" if you will, well, less life-threatening. I mean...fixable issues (not malignancies). The biggest issue with altered seniors is either cardiac, skeletal or dental, and I'm guessing dental issues can lead to the other issues. My (spayed) Libs is going on 11yrs. this spring; I've kept her teeth very clean, and she has no skeletal issues or heart issues ![]() Let's just put it this way...any more, when we are asked to take seniors, it's not "do they have bad teeth", it's "are they altered". |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,455
|
Depends on what you want to do with your dog...
Mines not neutered...I used to love going to dog parks...we go less and less now because I can't trust other males not to react to him (be it neutered or intact). Mostly other intact males, and just dogs with questionable temperaments seem to take issue with other males that are intact. So I don't trust the off-leash environment because if another male tries to dominate my dog or reacts to him, my dog will not take it lying down and then the big bad shepherd becomes the bad guy. A small minority of dogs at my GSD club are neutered. We have plenty that don't like other males, gets annoying because their owners want the same rights as those of us with friendly males. They like to tell US to get away from their dogs even though THEIR dogs are the problem. So although some people will tell you that you will have more problems with neutered males...I've seen that intact males are the bigger issue. I'm also not one to neuter my dog just because other dogs react to him...so he'll never be neutered. I've just adjusted my visits and instead of going to the dog park we go to a regular county park where there are much less dogs and due to me having off lead control I can be relaxed there.
__________________
Rooney CD RE TC HIC 7/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
__________________
Hunter, USA trial helper, Charleston Working Dog Club Training Helper Beschützer des Jägers v. Sportwaffen, HOT, IPO1, AD, CGC Katya v. Hügelblick, HOT, IPO2, CGC SG Aska v. Ketscher Wald, 2 x SchH3, Kkl 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 11,005
|
hunter, I'm not here to debate s/n.
I'm giving my experiences, and my experience has been, I've not seen any bone cancers, or prostate cancers. I've been at the vet clinic when dogs had issues with prostate and were still intact, in some cases fighting for their lives and losing, and I've seen more than my share of reproductive tract cancers. Many folks seem to feel there's nothing wrong with leaving animals intact into their golden years, and I really feel it's irresponsible (of me anyway) to just say "go for it" without adding my experiences. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Then I thought, maybe for professional groomers? But then show dogs are always intact, and there doesn't seem to be any issues there. And for my personal dog, he did all his health testing with no sedation, so he would definitely accept a groomer handling. But maybe most intact dogs don't behave at the groomers?? Really I just like grooming my own dogs and I don't find it harder to groom my intact GS vs my other two who were neutered (Husky 6mo, Chi/Pom 2 years).... So, yeah sorry to go off track - just thought it was a wierd statement LOL Last edited by N Smith; 01-18-2013 at 02:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 16,235
|
I could be way off, but that's what came to mind. However I'm talking about trimming these 8 inches of butt fluff, not a stock coated GSD (my GSDs never go to the groomer, just normal bathing and brushing).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
No Stinkin' Leashes Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 27,388
|
Freestep IS a professional groomer, so I would assume that's what she meant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,648
|
Quote:
Sorry! Carry on. Sheilah |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|