Breeding a WL to a SL? - Page 3 - German Shepherd Dog Forums

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50%

GermanShepherds.com is the premier German Shepherd Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2012, 02:39 PM   #21 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bocron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Milton, Georgia
Posts: 1,995
Default

So you don't know if the sire of these 2 litters would be considered SL or WL I'm guessing. Post a link to the litter or you can PM and I can try to fill in the blank.
__________________
Annette Holbrook

www.coppercreekdvg.com- All Breed Schutzhund Club

Home of Umarek von Hugelblick, my good luck charm!
bocron is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-10-2012, 02:41 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 385
Default

Sorry, that wasn't clear was it.

Two different litters, one a SL litter and one a WL litter as represented by the breeders, have the same father.

If the the father is a SL dog, the WL litter is the cross. If the father is a WL dog, then the SL litter is the cross.

Right?
Beau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 02:41 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bocron View Post
So you don't know if the sire of these 2 litters would be considered SL or WL I'm guessing. Post a link to the litter or you can PM and I can try to fill in the blank.
Exactly.
Beau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 02:42 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master Member
 
Lakl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beau View Post
Sorry, that wasn't clear was it.

Two different litters, one a SL litter and one a WL litter as represented by the breeders, have the same father.

If the the father is a SL dog, the WL litter is the cross. If the father is a WL dog, then the SL litter is the cross.

Right?
Do they provide a pedigree to the sire?
Lakl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 02:51 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master Member
 
Lakl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 906
Default

They are both showlines. The one you called a WL breeder is doing a litter of SL pups. The sire is showline.
Lakl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 03:02 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakl View Post
They are both showlines. The one you called a WL breeder is doing a litter of SL pups. The sire is showline.
Okay, that explains it. Thanks!
Beau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 03:05 PM   #27 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bocron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Milton, Georgia
Posts: 1,995
Default

The female that WL kennel used in the breeding to Solo is also a SL dog. They must have gotten the bitch somehow and decided to produce a SL litter.
We had a similar situation a few years back, we had friends who we imported a very nice SL female for. (she was SchH1, KkL1, good hips/elbows and great temperament). They really wanted a litter out of her, but were nervous about the whole thing. They talked us into helping them so I found the sire (one of Yuliya's males, Yash) and I took the female for the breeding. About a week before the pups were due, we moved the dam to our house. She had the litter here and we raised the litter and helped sell the pups. We got a male pup in exchange and my husband got listed as the breeder. So while we aren't "SL" breeders, we did have a SL litter here .
__________________
Annette Holbrook

www.coppercreekdvg.com- All Breed Schutzhund Club

Home of Umarek von Hugelblick, my good luck charm!
bocron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 03:21 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 385
Default

Thanks for the help and the clarification!

Sorry to derail the thread......
Beau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 04:35 PM   #29 (permalink)
Administrator & LOTR Addict
 
lhczth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 13,711
Default

My answer would be indifferent. It is not something that interests me nor something I would do, but to each his own.
lhczth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 08:29 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
LukasGSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mansfield, TX.
Posts: 328
Default

It may seem like a pretty obvious statement, but I think to get the best results by combining the two is going to take years of breeding, through careful selection, trial and error to actually achieve what one would HOPE for consistantly.

So no, I'm not opposed to it. But I think somebody just needs to consistantly stick with it and not expect immediate results.
LukasGSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
PetGuide.com
Basset.net DobermanTalk.com GoldenRetrieverForum.com OurBeagleWorld.com
BoxerForums.com DogForums.com GoPitbull.com PoodleForum.com
BulldogBreeds.com FishForums.com HavaneseForum.com SpoiledMaltese.com
CatForum.com GermanShepherds.com Labradoodle-dogs.net YorkieForum.com
Chihuahua-People.com RetrieverBreeds.com