I see, from a facebook print screen clip that there is a breeder in Ontario with at least one of the male dogs who is trying to get the AKC papers so he can breed him. Word is he is also in possession of Dante vom Hunter Haus.
I would love an explanation as to why a shelter has the policy to give AKC dogs out to breeders? I have never heard of such a thing. EVER.
I'm trying to stay neutral until all the facts come out but PROOF like that is hard to ignore.
Hence , my question regarding the Horses "Sit, Stay" was referring to.
I too have seen those Facebook Posts , and YES that is certainly the case regarding not only those 2 dogs but others as well .
The only dogs that left intact were valuable dogs given to breeder friends of the CGHS chairperson, and to the Sherriffs themselves, along with Sherriffs immediate family ( Mother) .
The arresting officer got a puppy last a few weeks ago.
A puppy that was already sold to one of the owners in the current suit against the Shelter.
CGHS dismissed her claim of ownership and refused her claim to her pup even though she had a sales contract, along with her bank statement to verify payment.
Their claim was without AKC registration and vet records the dog did not belong to her.
There was a stay in place but the dog was given away despite the stay to the arresting officer .
That puppy was seized/ surrendered or whatever Perez is calling it these days at 5 weeks old so there would be no AKC registration or vet records obviously as the puppy was still with its mother at he time of the raid.
It is illegal in the state of New York to transfer a puppy to a new owner before 8 weeks of age, but apparently that law does not apply to CGHS.
They took 2 pups away from their mothers at 5 weeks old, and got away with it.
The first was taken directly from the "crime scene" and never accounted for. A 5 week old female pup just dissappeared into thin air.
Also , the 2 dogs that were adopted out immediately to people they "knew very well" were actually 3 young adult females adopted out immediately obviously intact because they were never even seen by the CGHS vet despite the fact that their search warrant specifically stated"all animals need to be retained as evidence."
Ive asked myself whom these people that they know so well are and how they were pre-approved for adoption of animals that were not even in their care or custody yet? Thats something I would find interesting to know, but likely never will.
Apparently the law does not apply to them and the Judge's orders from the start were ignored because they have their own agenda.
I do not know Dawn but I do have verifiable sources close to this situation and I made the decision early on to follow the story and see how it plays out before making any judgments either way.
Sit, Stays earlier post intrigued me regarding the horses because of the similarities but I feel in that case it was accusations and in this case its grand larceny. (JMHO).
I too will be waiting to hear more, not that I am sure I want to hear more because their actions are appalling and this case could set legal precedence that affects breeders far and wide for decades. Very scary.
Its like COPS "gone wild."
When and how will it end for everyone most importantly the dogs?
I guess we will all have to wait and see as of right now I know for a fact some Sherriff's deputy's , their families and other breeders including some competitors have some pretty valuable dogs for a mere $105 adoption fee and a handshake.