German Shepherd Dog Forums - Reply to Topic

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50% is the premier German Shepherd Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Thread: Victim in tree.. scared. Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces):
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the German Shepherd Dog Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
12-13-2013 02:01 PM
wyoung2153 Well that makes a whole lot of sense! We do a lot of hidden searches... Under camo blankets, in containers, but I don't the link we've disguised a person in a tree before. I will have to bring that up to my team lead. Really great advice!

Sent from Free App
12-13-2013 01:10 PM
jocoyn I had another SAR person point out something to me I should have thought about, since it is SOP for cadaver dog folks!

How much work do you do with concealed victims where he cannot see the victim? That can really throw a dog if they have not faced that before in training. Odor without the victim. One thing we have to worry about when we train cadaver dogs is that they indicate in the strongest odor, particularly when they cannot SEE an object as dogs are inclined to want to attach an object to an odor.

I will quote a statement he gave me. He is not a GSD person though certainly welcome to join the board

"This implies to me that they need to add into their training scenario making the victim physically inaccessible to the dog but not scent inaccessible. They need to put victims in camo covers and leave them in there even when the dog takes the handler to them, let the victim toss the ball out but have the handler interact with it. Put victims in boxes with air holes. When they put someone up in a tree, find a way to visually disguise them. This way the dog goes further to being ruled by its nose and not by its eyes which is ultimately what they need for a successful area search dog"
12-09-2013 12:02 PM
wyoung2153 Sorry for the delayed responding, a lot going on! Thank you all for the great advice and all the awesome posts, was very interesting to read about everyone's experiences. I will be sure to incorporate some of these techniques with Titan in the future.
12-08-2013 01:02 PM
gsdsar Forgot to add. Due to their natural suspicion, I have seen lots of GSD get weirded out by victims at night, or victims that "act weird". So if you have not done problems with these variables I would. Victims rocking, mumbling, being combative, quick movements at nights, walking in circles, yelling.

A lot of calls are for people not in the right mind. You need to know BEFORE you go on a search how your dog responds to abnormal behavior and train for it. So if your dog is hesitant at a person in a tree he may be hesitant of other things. Better to find out now.

Sent from Free App
12-08-2013 10:27 AM
gsdsar This is not uncommon. My wilderness team used to frequently put victims in deer stands. It not only teaches dogs you scent up, but also gets them used to seeing people up high.

I would not do it in conjunction with an actual problem yet. I would take a few steps back and really get the dog in crazy drive, have the victim tease with toy, runaway, climb the tree(all in eyesight of dog) then drop the toy( in a long line) as the dog moves in. Rinse repeat, until the dog is coming in close to the tree and actively trying to engage.

The do a runaway with victim going out if sight of dog and repeat the process.

Take the thinking out if it for the dog for right now. If the dog is really hesitant, the handler can be the one running away and being victim until the dog gets it.

I would not be asking for his trained indication yet, reward the dog for looking up, reward the search. Once tha is solid, ask for the indication.

Sent from Free App
12-08-2013 09:35 AM
David Winners I even use a clicker for some stuff LOL

Marker training draws some pretty crude comments from a lot of handlers and trainers though. Results breed converts. Usually they start off mocking me until they watch us work. Then they start buying Michael Ellis dvds

David Winners
12-08-2013 09:28 AM
Baillif I like it. MWD training and handler skill has come a long long way.
12-08-2013 09:14 AM
David Winners Danger Will Robinson... really long post LOL

I have dealt with several detection dogs that developed fearful reactions and avoidance due to noises. They were refusing to work under certain conditions.

I will discuss one particular dog, as we worked out of the same location and I conducted most of the training with him. I will leave out non-pertinent information to protect my brothers working in bad places, so please have patience with any lack of specifics about the situation.

This dog is of solid nerves, and very environmentally sound. He regularly experiences gunfire and mortar round explosions. He rides in aircraft. He confronts all situations with a smile and wag of his tale. He is confident in all he does. I had spent 7 months around this dog before the following incident.

The area the dog was working was very familiar to him, as he worked in that location 3 to 4 times a week for a period of several months before the following incident took place. He was frightened by a loud noise while searching a particular object. He went into avoidance of the object, returned to his handler, tucked his tail, began panting and licking his lips. After a short break and removal from the immediate area, the dog refused to work, and failed to respond to a drop aid that was placed so as to be sure the dog was in the scent cone. He shut down.

Upon returning to the FOB, the dog would not work or leave the handler.

The following day, a training venue was set up in a location the dog was very familiar with to see if he would work at all. One of the objects the dog was exhibiting fear around was placed at the end of the training venue to gauge his reaction. The dog responded successfully during the training exercise, except at the end when the fear object was present. At this time he avoided the object , seeking reassurance from the handler. The dog's reaction was not as fearful as during the initial incident, but he still ignored odor and went into avoidance.

We used a program of desensitization through successive approximation and avoided flooding to keep from pushing the dog into a deeper fearful state.

A fear object was placed in a large open area. The dog was walked into the same area as the object and the distance at which the dog began to exhibit the smallest amount of fear response was noted. This distance was 60 meters. A flag was placed in the ground here for reference. An arc of 5 flags was placed at this distance from the fear object to create a reaction line. Flags were also placed at 10m intervals closer to the object for successive reference points. Picture a dart board with the fear object being the bulls-eye.

The dog was run through OB exercises, and allowed to roam freely outside his reactive zone. Every time he looked at the fear object he was rewarded. It is important to state that the dog must be working outside the range at which he exhibits fear. We were rewarding the lack of fear response. The dog was worked on leash and never allowed inside the reactive arc. The idea was to not allow the dog to experience fear.

The dog was trained in this manner for 4-5 minute sessions, 15 times a day. Concurrent odor training was taking place at another familiar location, where his reward frequency was lowered while the find frequency was raised. He went to 1 in 8 fixed reward schedule in hopes to raise his frustration enough to drive him into the fear object when the time came. Concurrent gunfire training was taking place at the range.

The following day, the dog was tested at the 50m flags to ensure there was no fear response. The outer flags were removed and the training moved 10m closer to the fear object. This same procedure was followed every day until the arc was removed.

Once the arc was removed, games of hide and seek were played with the reward as the hidden object. At no time did the dog exhibit fear towards anything. The rewards were initially placed away from the fear object, with subsequent games moving closer, and finally in contact with the fear object.

Once the dog was successfully operating around and on the fear object without demonstrating avoidance, odor was placed in the same manner as the rewards, moving successively closer, and finally in contact with the fear object.

After the initial desensitization to the object was complete, training moved to the fearful location. The dog was allowed to relax in the environment without any stress added by handler commands to perform any OB or search behaviors. The dog played 2 ball and tug games in the fear location for a full day and then returned home. Slowly, loud noises were included into the training. The following day, simple training exercises were conducted on odor, with a high find frequency and 1 in 8 reward schedule to help build drive.

After 2 days operating in the fear location without seeing any fearful reactions, training venues were set up in the fear location with the fear object in proximity to the training. Hides were moved successively closer to the fear object, until the dog was responding to odor placed directly on the fear object.

The team was then run on several blind training venues at the fear location which included the fear objects. When the team proved it would work in this location with no distraction caused by the location, loud noises in the location, or close contact with the fear object, they returned to duty.

10 days training were spent on the dog before it was returned to duty. Every step of the training was based on the reaction of the dog, not a schedule written on paper.

I do believe the training could have occurred at a faster pace, but chose to take things slowly to avoid any handler issues or set-backs in training.

It is easier to handle situations like this when you are a handler, and it is your sole responsibility to train and operate with your dog. If the dog is not mission capable, you have 24 hours a day to work on the situation until it is fully mission capable. The dog is your life.

David Winners
12-08-2013 08:49 AM
Baillif I'd be interested in seeing it too.
12-08-2013 08:45 AM
David Winners Good points Nancy. Environmental stress creates misses. It's the number one reason I will drop a dog.

To the OP:

I would start with lower high finds and incrementally raise them. Start squatting on a chair, move on top of a low car, into the crotch of a small tree, up from there. The situation may have just been so strange he couldn't comprehend it. I've had it happen to me, and I'm far from environmentally unstable, but it was more than likely fear.

The reward should already be a 10 / 10 for a find, so I doubt you are going to be able to raise the reward value. I would work on DS training using finds and a 1:1 reward schedule.

I wrote up a DS/CC training schedule I used for a dog that was startled when he was searching under a semi truck and the parking brake was pulled. If you are interested, I can dig it up.

David Winners
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2