German Shepherd Dog Forums - Reply to Topic

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50%

GermanShepherds.com is the premier German Shepherd Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Thread: What do you think of the new BAT 2.0? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces):
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the German Shepherd Dog Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
04-05-2014 08:30 PM
David Winners
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaimeju View Post
Exactly.



Could you go into more detail about how the aggressive dogs reacted? I'm curious if it mirrors my own experience at all. I used to do a lot of BAT with my dog, but found that it was actually reinforcing her to pay more attention to the trigger and not to me. We eventually just started doing normal obedience and focus work with a lot of emphasis on watching her threshold.
No focus on handler. Locked on to target, aggressive behavior increasing. Threshold lowering because of self rewarding behavior. Because the training is aversive free, there were no consequences for the dog not making the right decision. Basically, everything got worse.

I find it much more effective to train and proof a behavior, like heel or watch, and then work with these behaviors outside threshold. If the dog does it right, you reward. If it blows you off, you can correct the dog for refusing a proofed behavior.

Even better yet, for aggressive dogs, is the Lou Castle crittering protocol. I believe this changes how the dog views the situation and encourages good decisions, along with adding control. It's not for everyone. It involves an e-collar which some feel is not appropriate.

David Winners
04-05-2014 11:32 AM
Kaimeju
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Winners View Post
I don't see how someone can put a label on walking under threshold on a long line and claim it as their system.
Exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Winners View Post
BAT, in it's original form was a good tool for fearful dogs when distance from the trigger will act as a functional reward. It was terrible for aggression though. I have helped a few people through serious issues that worsened because they were empowering the wrong dog to make the wrong decisions by following BAT principles.
Could you go into more detail about how the aggressive dogs reacted? I'm curious if it mirrors my own experience at all. I used to do a lot of BAT with my dog, but found that it was actually reinforcing her to pay more attention to the trigger and not to me. We eventually just started doing normal obedience and focus work with a lot of emphasis on watching her threshold.
04-05-2014 08:02 AM
Baillif The same way the cross fit people tried to copyright exercising.
04-05-2014 02:23 AM
David Winners I missed this when you posted it.

I just read the whole site and handouts and it's kind of silly to put a name on this. BAT 2.0, not really. It seems that the original system wasn't working well so it got revamped into standard, below threshold walking. This will work well for aggressive or fearful dogs, where the original was not good for aggressive dogs at all. The thing that kind of makes me laugh is that it's not really a training system at all, it's just good dog handling. If you read all the handouts, the options you have are huge. Rewards can be anything. You just feel your way along and try and do the right thing. That's not a system in my eyes. It can work, but trainers do it all the time naturally. I don't see how someone can put a label on walking under threshold on a long line and claim it as their system.


BAT, in it's original form was a good tool for fearful dogs when distance from the trigger will act as a functional reward. It was terrible for aggression though. I have helped a few people through serious issues that worsened because they were empowering the wrong dog to make the wrong decisions by following BAT principles.

I kind of think it's someone trying to make money off something that any good trainer can show a student in a session or 2.
02-18-2014 05:23 PM
Kaimeju
What do you think of the new BAT 2.0?

New! BAT 2.0 Information | Empowered Animals

I feel like this is a step backwards. The old protocols were helpful for marking and reinforcing disengagement. I don't see how this would work for a dog that doesn't find disengaging inherently rewarding.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
PetGuide.com
Basset Hound Forum Doberman Forum Golden Retriever Forum Beagle Forum
Boxer Forum Dog Forum Pit Bull Forum Poodle Forum
Bulldog Forum Fish Forum Havanese Forum Maltese Forum
Cat Forum German Shepherd Forum Labradoodle Forum Yorkie Forum Hedgehog Forum
Chihuahua Forum Retriever Breeds Cichlid Forum Dart Frog Forum Mice Breeder Forum