German Shepherd Dog Forums - Reply to Topic

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50%

GermanShepherds.com is the premier German Shepherd Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Thread: 39 PB GSD's in DURHAM NY Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces):
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the German Shepherd Dog Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Yesterday 04:09 PM
Needing Advise
Quote:
Originally Posted by selzer View Post
I think photos can lie. They can be photos of other dogs, in other places. They can be photos of dogs/crates taken days after the owner was allowed in to care for the dogs. They can be photos that have been doctored. They can show a moment in time, but may not give the overall impression.

I think it is pretty disgusting if the dogs that are seized have been handed out to other breeders to be show and bred under their kennel names. And that suggests strongly that the motives of the seizure may not have been as altruistic as we might want to believe.

I guess since I really don't know anything about the case, I will wait and see what happens in the court.

When it is all said and done though, I would really like to know why the litters and dams were in crates like that, it seems dangerous as well as unsanitary. I guess I would rather hear that someone on the seizing team put them like that, than a breeder had them actually living like that.
If Dawn kept those dogs in filthy crates with 2 - 3 inches of urine & feces for long periods of time I would think the pads of all their paws would be burned from the old urine & infected by the feces. Especially since some of those crates look very old & I'm sure the dogs would be scratching on the wires to get free from standing in that mess. Maybe CGHS Vet didn't think to put that in his records, he writes things about nails could use clipping.
Yesterday 03:43 PM
Needing Advise
Quote:
Originally Posted by northwoodsGSD View Post
Proof in writing...
This is Embroh, Frank states in the comments that he has a breeding planned with him.

This is Dante, at a show
I am amazed at what is going on & how many people are involved in this unlawful seizure. Dante & Embroh sure recovered fast from a life & death situation (NOT)
IMO even the AKC is in on this, I just might be able to prove that too.
Oh God, what crooks. I pray to God I find a competent :Lawyer that is not afraid of suing the Police, Sheriffs, State Troopers, CGHS, CGHS Vet who misdiagnosed one of my dogs & his treatment, the AKC, and the list goes on & on. They are keeping me from even visiting my dogs which I haven't seen in months. I can't take much more of this. I am actually in therapy now and do not know what else to do.
Yesterday 03:41 PM
JakodaCD OA those links above do not lie..apparently, these two dogs atleast, are out in the show ring/going to be bred..

I agree, someone needs to stand up and do something about it,,soooo wrong
Yesterday 11:35 AM
selzer I think photos can lie. They can be photos of other dogs, in other places. They can be photos of dogs/crates taken days after the owner was allowed in to care for the dogs. They can be photos that have been doctored. They can show a moment in time, but may not give the overall impression.

I think it is pretty disgusting if the dogs that are seized have been handed out to other breeders to be show and bred under their kennel names. And that suggests strongly that the motives of the seizure may not have been as altruistic as we might want to believe.

I guess since I really don't know anything about the case, I will wait and see what happens in the court.

When it is all said and done though, I would really like to know why the litters and dams were in crates like that, it seems dangerous as well as unsanitary. I guess I would rather hear that someone on the seizing team put them like that, than a breeder had them actually living like that.
Yesterday 11:35 AM
onyx'girl The shelter needs to step up and answer questions about their actions....the agenda is playing out just as planned
Yesterday 10:53 AM
northwoodsGSD Proof in writing...
This is Embroh, Frank states in the comments that he has a breeding planned with him.

This is Dante, at a show
Yesterday 10:32 AM
jaggirl47 Blanketback, yes there is proof. 100% undeniable proof.
Yesterday 10:24 AM
Blanketback
Quote:
Originally Posted by northwoodsGSD View Post
The dogs that have been placed with the breeders(that are friendly w/ the rescue... go figure) are already back in the show ring & have planned breedings with these dogs.
WHAT?! Do you have proof of this? How absolutely unethical, if this is true.
Yesterday 10:21 AM
northwoodsGSD
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakodaCD OA View Post

In the end, pictures don't lie, people do, people speculate, the only ones that know the 'real' truth are the ones immediatly involved.

I hope the REAL owners of the dogs , the ones not owned by Dawn, get their dogs back.
Bolding is mine....

The thing with the above, is that most of those in the position to "know the facts" are hiding behind a bunch of under the table dealings & dirty back stabbing. So how is anyone supposed to believe what they say?

The dogs that have been placed with the breeders(that are friendly w/ the rescue... go figure) are already back in the show ring & have planned breedings with these dogs. Smells a bit fishy to me
04-13-2014 06:48 PM
Fran Kerrigan I agree 100% that the dogs should be returned to their rightful owners, and I pray that happens.
I do not know Dawn, but I do know, not believe "know" , that there were not six 2 year olds seized or surrendered. Two of my siblings do know Dawn personally, and one of them was actually present when the names and ages of the dogs were compiled for their identification which did not occur until Feb 28th.
Hence my question to EJQ , because that post says she were there the day after the dogs were taken and what they thought were puppies were actually 2 year olds. I think its a good question. What facts were based on that conclusion? The SPCA did not know, or ask at that time who these dogs were, their names, ages, owners....nada.
They should have and would have IMO if they had any intention of returning them to their rightful owners.
I truly am curious as to what led EJQ to the conclusion they were 2 years old? There were not six 2 year olds. So did she come to this conclusion on her own? Or was this another case of innaccurate info being provided by the SPCA to the public , only to be posted on an internet forum with no knowledge of the actual facts or identities of the dogs?
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
PetGuide.com
Basset.net DobermanTalk.com GoldenRetrieverForum.com OurBeagleWorld.com
BoxerForums.com DogForums.com GoPitbull.com PoodleForum.com
BulldogBreeds.com FishForums.com HavaneseForum.com SpoiledMaltese.com
CatForum.com GermanShepherds.com Labradoodle-dogs.net YorkieForum.com
Chihuahua-People.com RetrieverBreeds.com