|01-19-2014 06:16 PM|
|doggiedad||i like the 1st pic.|
|01-19-2014 06:07 PM|
|Susan_GSD_mom||I used to work for a printing company, I was their Photoshop "expert"... I like the second one for the same reasons others liked it as far as the dog himself, but the color doesn't look 'true'. Do you know anyone who does Photoshop color work who could do some color work on it for you? I would remove some of the blue, brighten it a bit, add some contrast, and work in the color channels to put more definition between his topline and the trees in the background. It's not creating anything false, just correcting bad lighting, etc., and emphasizing your dog, not the background. Number 2 has more density than the others, and where there is some density you can remove the excess and have a decent photo. It's what should have been done with the camera, but that's what Photoshop is for!|
|01-19-2014 04:55 PM|
|01-19-2014 03:20 PM|
|01-18-2014 11:42 PM|
|ksotto333||The second one really stood out for me...nice looking boy...|
|01-18-2014 11:18 PM|
|Donovan514||I like the brightness of he first pic, but the second pic shows a better overall stance. Second pic gets my vote.|
|01-18-2014 11:15 PM|
|Kahrg4||I vote second photo as well.|
|01-18-2014 11:07 PM|
Second one for sure
Sent from Petguide.com Free App
|01-18-2014 10:46 PM|
I like the second photo.
Background is fairly plain, dog's structure is clearly visible. The head is also more visible in this photo.
Very handsome boy by the way!
|01-18-2014 10:34 PM|
|middleofnowhere||Second one. Legs are straight and tongue is in.|
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|