|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
|
Do you sedate for OFA?
There are 2 vets close to me that do OFA. One always does full sedation for xrays. The second vet only sedates if necessary and then only a strong enough dosage to get a quality image. So, which is better? Sedated? Or not sedated? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
|
to clarify, the first vet knocks the dogs completely out. The second vet only enough to relax the muscles.
there is also a $100+ price difference between the 2. Vet 1 has experience taking xrays. Vet 2 is used by a friend from the kennel club as well as several other breeders. She does dozens of OFAs a year just from people that are in the club. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 684
|
Many Vets say sedated is best for positioning purposes. The hind limbs must be manipulated into a somewhat uncomfortable position. To ensure the dog is relaxed sedation may be needed.
That being said I have had 2 of my dogs hip rads done without sedation. These dogs are pets with no chance of being bred. I was taking rads for my own curiosity and did not actually send them away to be evaluated. They were checked by myself and other veterinary professionals. There was no need to send rads to OFA or Pen, healthy dogs with no breeding in thier future. I was able to get the dogs into proper position without sedation, not all dogs will tolerate this. My male (first ever purchased from a breeder has BEAUTIFUL hips btw).
__________________
Sydney(rescue)-Pit cross Birbo(rescue)-GSD Until we meet again . . . Bear(rescue)-GSD, my soul mate. Kai-(rescue)GSD, my forever baby. Kobie-Pomeranian, my tiniest dog with the biggest heart. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
If it is not necessary for your dog to be completely sedated, and it makes you uncomfortable to have your dog completely sedated then I say go with vet #2. I have never been a fan of chemical restraint that is not warranted.
__________________
Sydney(rescue)-Pit cross Birbo(rescue)-GSD Until we meet again . . . Bear(rescue)-GSD, my soul mate. Kai-(rescue)GSD, my forever baby. Kobie-Pomeranian, my tiniest dog with the biggest heart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SW, MI
Posts: 21,351
|
It also depends on the dog....it is very difficult to pull those legs straight when the dog is in a vulnerable position. My male is strong/and would never tolerate it without relaxation sedation. Sedation/relaxed but not "out" is what we did~ injectable ace...no reversal, so he was groggy but up and about within minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
The dog is on his/her back, with strangers holding front and rear legs. The person holding the rear legs must rotate the legs inward so that the patella is pointing at the ceiling (when a dog is on its back the hind legs naturally assume a "frog leg" position). Awkward and uncomfortable for the dog.
__________________
Sydney(rescue)-Pit cross Birbo(rescue)-GSD Until we meet again . . . Bear(rescue)-GSD, my soul mate. Kai-(rescue)GSD, my forever baby. Kobie-Pomeranian, my tiniest dog with the biggest heart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 825
|
We always anesthetized dogs for these. The legs have to be manipulated into a very uncomfortable position to get ACCURATE results.
However it also depends on the patient. If the dog is willing to be held on its back then have its legs extended all the way out and then turned in quite a way you could get away with it but I would think some sedation would in most cases be required. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|