|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 122
|
Just saw this posted on CL.... I really dont think it be so easy to just "give up" your pet... I think the solution is to make people get a permit from the city/county/state before they can get a pet. and if they give up the pet, they get fined.... I honestly havent thought this out 100% so not sure if that would even work, but something should be done!!
Quote:
__________________
Ice - 06/02/2010 |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North DFW, TX
Posts: 9,215
|
If they made penalties for giving up pets, people would just take them out in the country and dump them. Or shoot them.
__________________
Rocky vom Backyard- 10 years young Kopper vom Felssclucht Bach - 17 months At the Bridge: Cash van der Animal Shelter 2006-2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 101
|
I just saw that posted on the OH craigslist too! Not sure if it's 100% true (i.e. 72 hr rule) but I felt that it made a really good point. The pet overpopulation problem is huge and really goes unnoticed. Reality checks are really needed for the general public.
There's a veterinary blog, I think it's called Veterinarians Behaving Badly, and it's a vet that posts humorous, satire comments related to the clients he deals with. It's pretty funny/REALLY SCARY some of the things the general public thinks about animals. I.e. a person calling thinking their cat was pregnant from their toy breed dog. Some serious education is needed. I've always had a guilty conscious about buying my Lab and the fact that I really want to buy instead of rescuing a GSD. We've always had rescue dogs as family dogs and I've seen to pros and cons to going both ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
Personally I wouldn't benefit from such a course as I likely know more about dog ownership than the person who would be teaching it, but, if it meant that only devoted people would be able to get pets, I would be all for such a system. All I know is something has to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 5,531
|
Then you are stomping on people's freedoms.
Pet ownership is a right. Animals are property. And as such, not protected under some laws - but that's okay, IMO. If animal rights activists had it their way we'd never own pets. There's got to be a middle ground.
__________________
Ruger v. Sunnyside Stray 4-11-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 393
|
A pet ownership course is middle ground. It's not stomping on anyone's rights any more than having to take a driving test is. Besides, where does it say you have the right to own a pet? I'm not familiar with any such law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 2,841
|
Wow that article is depressing. Glad you shared it, though.
__________________
Dolly Eskie 6/03 Suri Shiba 10/07 Bailey WGSD/Husky x 5/11 Bailey's brother Tucker (rescue/foster dude) Tiger kitty '96 Information is power |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 452
|
It probably won't do any good, but I copied and pasted it to my local CL. I've gotten a couple of responses telling me thank you. It hasn't been flagged yet, and it's been up for a few hours I guess
__________________
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b6...ime3/Snick.png |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 5,531
|
Quote:
There simply isn't any stating you cannot.
__________________
Ruger v. Sunnyside Stray 4-11-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,833
|
It depends on the shelter. That was what the shelter in my home town was like, from what I heard from my friends who volunteered. However there are shelters that do things right and won't kill. There are shelters that euthanize the correct way. The description of these shelters as "animal murder factories", in all honesty, makes me want to avoid ever setting foot in them, even to adopt. I'd rather pay the adoption fee and support a no-kill shelter.
When both of my cats were adopted, there was $100 fee each. I made out the checks for $200 each. I donate hundreds to the no-kill shelters every year to keep them going. Raising awareness of a shelter as a murder shelter is like raising awareness for companies that use child slave labor. It usually has the opposite of the intended effect. Instead of driving people to support the company so the laborers get paid better, people usually boycott it. I also disagree with the comment about breeding. Breeding isn't the issue. It's people grabbing pets without thinking first that's the problem. An acquaintance of mine who has loved cats for years and years is giving up all three of her cats because they're "not getting along with her new baby". People like that just don't think, and that's a huge part of the problem.
__________________
Viking vom Zeder-Kamme (11/19/2011) Last edited by ladyfreckles; 01-21-2012 at 09:25 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|