|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Roanoke Va
Posts: 50
|
I prefer the Blue Buffalo Wilderness, because it doesn't have any grains in it. Does anyone think the BB for large dogs is better than the wilderness? I am getting a puppy soon, and wanted to use the BB Wilderness. Good idea?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 956
|
If you are getting a puppy and like BB products, then you should go witih BB Large Breed Puppy...not the Wilderness. Wilderness is only for adult dogs.
__________________
-Jessica Cheyenne von der Price-Sable GSD-12/20/10-CGC Faegan vom Johnson-Haus "Panzer"-Black GSD-12/31/11-S.T.A.R. Puppy |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,380
|
For a puppy, no. For an adult, yes.
Like Jessica said, if you want to stick with BB, go with large breed puppy.
__________________
Ozzy - Chocolate Pom "In a perfect world, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog." My Photography |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Roanoke Va
Posts: 50
|
I am so sorry for not being more clear. I meant the BB wilderness puppy formula. I think that it may be relatively new, because I too remember only seeing it for adults. I went on their website and they have one flavor, chicken, puppy form. Some people swear by large breed puppy forms, but I do like the wilderness because of the lack of grain. My other dog seemed to do much better on that than other dog foods. I just wasn't sure if you thought there was something better in the large breed formula??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
I think you will be pleased with the product. I've fed my dogs Blue before going raw and they did well on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North DFW, TX
Posts: 9,214
|
Puppy Wilderness has 1.3% calcium minimum. That might be fine for a smaller breed, but I wouldn't feed it to a GSD.
BLUE Buffalo Wilderness - Natural Evolutionary Chicken Diet for Puppies ? Grain Free
__________________
Rocky vom Backyard- 10 years young Kopper vom Felssclucht Bach - 17 months At the Bridge: Cash van der Animal Shelter 2006-2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Roanoke Va
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Last edited by ILOVEGSD; 10-27-2011 at 09:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
I ask because every large breed puppy food I see in the stores here locally has 1.0 or 1.2% min. calcium. I'm sure some have even more. Without spending $60 a bag, what food has a low % of calcium. And are these really bad, millions of GSD owners have fed and currently do feed them and I haven't heard of an excessive amount amount of issues. Thanks.
__________________
Six - 8/16/2011 Reggie J. Simpson - 9 y/o GSD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North DFW, TX
Posts: 9,214
|
Quote:
Several studies have been done conclusively showing a link between higher-calcium diets in puppyhood and joint disease later in life. The problem is that excess calcium causes the long bones in the leg to grow faster than the joints can handle. We know that a long lever can produce more force than a shorter lever. The puppies' legs grow too fast and the longer legs produce too much torque on the joints. You say millions of GSD owners feed them without issue, but the GSD has a reputation for hip problems. If we know that higher-calcium food can cause hip problems, why would you feed a higher calcium food?
__________________
Rocky vom Backyard- 10 years young Kopper vom Felssclucht Bach - 17 months At the Bridge: Cash van der Animal Shelter 2006-2010
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |