|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
|
Hey guys just a quick question my dog weighs 30 pounds and he is 12 weeks. When I checked the blue buffalo large breed puppy the minimum weight on it was 50 pounds.. He has been eating it well but should I switch back to the regular puppy Blue Buffalo instead of Large breed puppy? Or should I ignore it and keep feeding him large breed?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 956
|
I'm pretty sure with Buffalo Blue LBP, they base their feeding on the size of the dog at Adult stage, vs. what they are right now....
__________________
-Jessica Cheyenne von der Price-Sable GSD-12/20/10-CGC Faegan vom Johnson-Haus "Panzer"-Black GSD-12/31/11-S.T.A.R. Puppy |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mont Co, PA
Posts: 4,627
|
LBP puppy is just fine. What Jessica was saying is that the label is telling you how to feed based on the expected adult weight, not the current weight. Same thing with all their formulas.
__________________
Jamie Raven (GSD) - December 8, 2007 Kaiser (GSD) - November 2009 Lead The Way Life's Abundance Last edited by gsdraven; 08-30-2011 at 02:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
|
Ok I understand now this is my first dog so I am new to this kind of stuff..I have also been reading that Large breed puppy food is not good for puppies because it contains to much calcium and stunts the growth. Is this true?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mont Co, PA
Posts: 4,627
|
Quote:
However, a look on BB's website showed that their regular puppy formula has a higher minimum calcium percentage (1.3%) than the LBP (1.2%). BUT, those are minimums which means it could be higher.
__________________
Jamie Raven (GSD) - December 8, 2007 Kaiser (GSD) - November 2009 Lead The Way Life's Abundance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 956
|
Quote:
And yes, most other puppy food has guidelines based on the current weight of your dog, along with how old they are. Buffalo Blue has you feed based on how old they are now, and the expected adult weight...so being a GSD, 70 lbs would be about right and the median for a GSD. You just need to go by how many months your puppy is...and follow the 51-70 guidelines. If you have a male, you could probably go to the 71-100 range...but keep at the low end of that. Blue Buffalo is a good food..and I would have stayed on it if Cheyenne didn't have issues with chicken. I had to find a lamb-based food for her...
__________________
-Jessica Cheyenne von der Price-Sable GSD-12/20/10-CGC Faegan vom Johnson-Haus "Panzer"-Black GSD-12/31/11-S.T.A.R. Puppy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 956
|
It is actually the other way around. The regular puppy formulas have too much calcium...not the large breed puppy formulas.
__________________
-Jessica Cheyenne von der Price-Sable GSD-12/20/10-CGC Faegan vom Johnson-Haus "Panzer"-Black GSD-12/31/11-S.T.A.R. Puppy |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,228
|
BB only posts their minimums...or they did back when I was feeding it. I quit using their food because I could not get them to disclose their maximums cal/pho. I tried several avenues all to no avail . I'm of the mindset if they were within range they would be proudly displaying it.
Maybe they are now, since I no longer use their product I don't keep up with it...but I have my doubts. Blue Buffalo - what are they hiding? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |