|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,517
|
Link to full article:
Dog-owner prevented from finding microchipped pet under Data Protection Act - Telegraph UK Man Prevented From Finding Chipped Pet Under Data Protection Act Dave Moorhouse was elated when he was informed that a microchip provider had information on the whereabouts of his stolen dog. This joy soon faded when the company informed him that it could not divulge the Jack Russell terrier's location because it would breach the Data Protection Act. Last week a court agreed with the chip company and refused Mr Moorhouse's request for a court order compelling them to reveal the name and address of the new owners. Steven Wildridge, managing director of the chip company said: “This is not a choice, it’s an obligation under the Data Protection Act. If the individuals involved do not want us to pass on their details to the original owner then we cannot do so unless compelled to following a criminal or civil proceeding." |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,227
|
That's ridiculous! I can understand not divulging information from one party to another (just because someone owns the microchip, doesn't mean they own the dog) but the police should get involved to help sort it out... Is this not why we have police? I know a lot of people couldn't care less about a stolen dog, I could care less about someone smoking a joint in their basement... Yet police get involved in that...
If someone steals a $200 car, they could face life in prison if it's their third offence but someone demented enough to steal a family member, authorities look the other way. ...leave me to "sort out" the ownership of my dogs myself and you bet the police will suddenly be interested
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kingston, IL
Posts: 3,027
|
Ditto!
__________________
Valerie Shewana's Maximum Velocity (aka Max) Shewana's Hot-Spice (aka Callan) Kaycee 11/97-5/10 ![]() Rio 10/08-2/10 ![]() Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or play with it, pee on it and walk away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Eastern, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 1,316
|
I would be beond PO'D. And out for blood if that was me and one of my babys
what's jus not right in any way shape or form
__________________
~Christen BELLA~GSD BATISTA~SHAR PEI BANDIT~CHI/YORKIE GABE~RAT TERRIE/CORGIE ANGLE~RAT TERRIER/CORGIE PEPPER~RAT TERRIER HONEY~CHIHUHUHA RUSTY~PAPILLION OLIVER~MUTT CHEWIE~POM MIX Levi~PAP/CHI Champ~PAP/CHI 11 CATS 1 TURTLE~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 302
|
What's the point of chipping if the chip company won't help you get your dog back? Am I missing something? I would find someone in the chip company with access to the info, bribe, and take care of it myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Maryland kinda missing CO
Posts: 13,811
|
Quote:
i completely agree. We chip out pets to get them back if they go missing. Why waste the money if its useless to do so?! I'm ticked off just reading about that!!! I didnt read the article but does anyone know the chip company? Get enough people ticked off about it, it would probably change policy pretty darn fast!!! Someone steals my dog, you better believe i'll find them one way or another.
__________________
The more people I meet and talk to,the more I love my dogs and their intelligence. www.krystalscollarcreations.weebly.com Riley GSD/BC 1/10/05 Zena GSD 6/1/03 Shasta GSD 5/5/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 254
|
ditto all responses! what a load of nonsense! what i dont get is, even if they have this stupid law why cant the authorities get involved and bring this dog back to the owner without having to reveal the 'mysterious whereabouts ' of the THEIF or not to judge ,but of the 'finder keeper' person. surely the police once havin determined whose dog it really is etc can make arrangements for it to be delivered back to the owner who obviously wants it back! But wait! its just a mutt right? why all the effort and money?
![]() this is sad. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|