|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: California
Posts: 1,351
|
For the purpose of this thread, leave out the most extreme dogs with bad nerves.
I'm interested in the ones that fall somwhere between extremes of bad nerves and extreme aggression. Which is most likely to succeed. A dog with solid nerves and a mediocre trainer or a good trainer with a somewhat nervous dog. Genetics vs training.
__________________
Andy |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,447
|
I think I have seen novice trainers do best with a good dog. They may not train all the behaviors to exacting points but with a good dog can get predictable performance.
A good trainer can also get far with a genetically challenged dog, depending on where they are exhibiting and the conditions. But, at any given time the dog can experience something that tasks it genetic ability to cope and the dog will be revealed. Just my thinking on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Alpha Bitch of the Wild Bunch
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 12,604
|
Succeed in what? It sounds like a training/competition question, but you put it in the breeding section......
__________________
Wildhaus Kennels Kaiser ~ SchH3 CGC TDI (HOT) Raven ~ SchH3 AWD2 PD1 P1 PA T1 UCD URO2 CGC TT (B/HOT) Della ~ SchHA TR1 PD1 P1 PA T1 URO2 CGC TT (B/HOT) Wulf ~ SchH1 PD1 P1 T1 URO2 CGC TT (B/HOT) Heidi ~ BH CD UCD RN URO1 (B/HOT) Jazz ~ Superpup In Training |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
The Italian One
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 8,639
|
I'm incline to agree with Samba.
I've seen both and in my opinion; The dog with the novice trainer may show errors on the novice's training side of things. He may not sit perfectly straight or something like that. While the nervous dog with a good trainer can't help but to eventually show a bit of his own nerve. Even if it is ever so slight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 12,962
|
Quote:
I don't think genetics vs. training is mutually exclusive or should be. You shouldn't just rely on one or the other. They should complement each other. I try to get dogs, genetically, that I believe will fit the style of training and competition I'm aiming for with that dog. It makes training easy.
__________________
UCH Alta-Tollhaus-Krieger Lamb Chop FO OB1 CL1R CL1F RA TT HIT TDI CGC VPC's Coca-Cola HIT CGC SG UCH Alta-Tollhaus Bono SchH1 AD T1 FO PA CL1R UNJ UCA HIT TT CGC OFA SG Pantalaimon vom Geistwasser BH AD HIT CGC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,447
|
When it comes to the dogs performance competition or family member, breeding and genetics matter.
I have a GSD not bred with great nerves or work ethic. Though she has earned high in trial....pressure of something can undo it to varying degrees. She is a rescue and she often reminds me how much breeding matters. Now, most people think she an exemplary dog. This is why it is important as to what knowledge and understanding breeding is based on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: California
Posts: 1,351
|
Quote:
Since genetics are part of breeding and training has a section as do sports. I didn't know where to put it. Feel free to move it to an appropriate section. I don't think the intention of the thread is that hard to figure out.. The values of genetics vs training. Of course you need some of both.
__________________
Andy Last edited by Jack's Dad; 11-14-2011 at 02:34 PM. Reason: Addl. Info. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MassaCHEWsetts
Posts: 5,222
|
Are you asking about nature .vs. nurture? Nurturing is a form of training in that it teaches the dog about its environment: whether to be trusting or not; whether to be skeptical of everything or not. Just the nurture part of a dog's life can 'train' it to act a certain way and a solid dog could be 'trained' to think of the world as a bad place, while a weak-nerved dog could be 'trained' to think of the world as full of good.
I have a dog that is more on the weak-nerved side but because of the way she was nurtured she is very trainable. I guess I am asking: where does nurturing end and training begin? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,608
|
I'd take good dog and novice handler any day...the novice handler can always learn more. The great trainer can only bring so much out of the weak dog. You can train, train, train, but when put under stress, the dog will always default back to it's weak genetics. The good dog will default back on its training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 12,962
|
To me nurture and training are the same. Nurture/training and then genetics. The way I see it, genetics will define where along a "spectrum" of any given behavior/trait/drive a dog could possibly fall, but nurture and training will pin-point more specifically where along the spectrum defined by genetics that the dog will actually fall. I don't believe you can truly train or nurture a dog to be something outside of its genetics.
__________________
UCH Alta-Tollhaus-Krieger Lamb Chop FO OB1 CL1R CL1F RA TT HIT TDI CGC VPC's Coca-Cola HIT CGC SG UCH Alta-Tollhaus Bono SchH1 AD T1 FO PA CL1R UNJ UCA HIT TT CGC OFA SG Pantalaimon vom Geistwasser BH AD HIT CGC |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |