Breeders claiming to own stud dogs they don't - German Shepherd Dog Forums

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50%

GermanShepherds.com is the premier German Shepherd Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-17-2011, 08:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Default Breeders claiming to own stud dogs they don't

I've come across some breeders' websites that have stud dog's listed as their own when I know for sure they don't own them. It's obviously to promote puppy sales. For the people who actually do own the dog and the public, it's fraud. Saying you have puppy by so and so is one thing, but listing a dog as belonging to that kennel when he is not owned by them is another. Has anyone else noticed this?
Jonro is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-17-2011, 08:57 AM   #2 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Kittilicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,099
Default

Is it possible they don't own them, but use them?
__________________
- Berleen -
Knuckles - born 8/21/11 - my big knucklehead
and can't forget Saki; the Golden Retriever, Born 11/07/07
The felines that rule the house - Oliver, Serena, Sakura & Bastian.
https://www.facebook.com/berleen
Kittilicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 09:12 AM   #3 (permalink)
Crowned Member
 
wolfstraum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 7,088
Default

Breeders often show dogs they have used for breeding on their sites...nothing wrong with that - I have a page for a male I do not own, but his owner is clearly stated on the page. Some people do not go into detail, but consider that "everyone" knows they just used the dog for stud or have a pup from him.

Lee
__________________
Csabre Sch1, Hexe Sch2, Bengal, Kyra, Kira & Kougar v Wolfstraum ~ Basha Sch3, Ghost Sch3 - Danger Sch1 SAR - ATB/Ret - Kyra, Sch3, Alice Sch1, Kelsey, Fenja Sch3

wolfstraum.net

wolfstraum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 09:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Knighted Member
 
Courtney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,907
Default

I see stud dogs on breeders site that I know they don't own...no issues. I like seeing what stud they are using with a pedigree link and picture. Some will say owned by XX, some don't which is fine.
Courtney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 09:20 AM   #5 (permalink)
Knighted Member
 
Konotashi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,380
Default

Are you sure they're claiming to own them? Or just that they use them? It's not uncommon for breeders to go outside of their own kennel to find a suitable mate for their bitches. Actually, I'd say it's more common for them to find an outside stud than use one of their own.

I'd personally rather see a breeder that goes outside of their own kennel to find a suitable male, because a breeder who thinks that all of their males/females will be a perfect pairing isn't the best breeder, IMO.
__________________
Ozzy - Chocolate Pom

"In a perfect world, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog."


My Photography
Konotashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 09:25 AM   #6 (permalink)
Knighted Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,224
Default

The term stud dog...simply means....dog used for "semen".
Unless someone states that the stud dog is owned by them.....it is just common practice to "exhibit" the stud dog that a breeder has used for breeding....whether owned by them or not.
I've used stud dogs from other kennels both here and Germany...I would never think twice about "exhibiting" their photo on my website or litter advertisement.
__________________
Huerta Hof German Shepherds
www.teamhuertahof.com
....where breeding is still considered an art....
robinhuerta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 09:41 AM   #7 (permalink)
The Rescues Rule Administrator
 
JeanKBBMMMAAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonro View Post
I've come across some breeders' websites that have stud dog's listed as their own when I know for sure they don't own them. It's obviously to promote puppy sales. For the people who actually do own the dog and the public, it's fraud. Saying you have puppy by so and so is one thing, but listing a dog as belonging to that kennel when he is not owned by them is another. Has anyone else noticed this?
That is what the OP is saying.

Acknowledges that you can say you have a puppy by so and so, but saying that the dog is your kennel's dog is another idea altogether.
JeanKBBMMMAAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 09:47 AM   #8 (permalink)
Knighted Member
 
Konotashi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,380
Default

Would you mind PM'ing me an example of of a breeder listing studs as their own?
__________________
Ozzy - Chocolate Pom

"In a perfect world, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog."


My Photography
Konotashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 10:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Knighted Member
 
GSDAlphaMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,227
Default

I wonder if they are really listed as such or of the OP assumes it. As already stated breeders do and should post breedings whether they own the stud or not. Can you image purchasing a puppy in which only the dam is listed? Exactly.
GSDAlphaMom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 01:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
Crowned Member
 
selzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark, Ohio
Posts: 17,499
Default

I know a stud owner who bred a bitch whose owner did exactly this. She put the dog on her website as her own. It was not appreciated by the stud owner, and she asked her to remove him from her site, which she did after a while.

I think that if you do not own the dog, then it costs NOTHING to list owned by _______ under his picture.

I too think it is good to use outside studs, there is certainly nothing wrong with that.

The reasons to list a dog as your own that is not, is to gain respect for owning such a dog, or to gain stud business for your own dogs. You can tell people who call, "Blitz" is currently unavailable, but I have "Fido" here with similar lines, etc, etc.

Frankly, I think it is unethical to list a stud without listing the stud's owner with him. However, if you have a dog, whose pedigree you are showing, and that dog is closely related, putting the dog's photo in the picture pedigree, that's not a problem.

The situation I was referring to had a page for each of their males and listed my friend's dog as one of their males. Since I bred to this same dog, I had my puppy buyers calling me and asking me if my friend sold her dog. That should never happen.
__________________
RIP Arwen, CD RN CGC
RIP Whitney, RN CGC

Jenna, RN CGC
Babs, CD RA CGC Herding Instinct Certificate
Heidi, RA CGC
Tori, RN CGC
SG3 Odessa, SchH1, Kkl1, AD
Ninja, RN CGC
Milla, RN CGC
Joy, Star Puppy, RN CGC
Dolly & Bear
selzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
PetGuide.com
Basset.net DobermanTalk.com GoldenRetrieverForum.com OurBeagleWorld.com
BoxerForums.com DogForums.com GoPitbull.com PoodleForum.com
BulldogBreeds.com FishForums.com HavaneseForum.com SpoiledMaltese.com
CatForum.com GermanShepherds.com Labradoodle-dogs.net YorkieForum.com
Chihuahua-People.com RetrieverBreeds.com