|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 44
|
I've come across some breeders' websites that have stud dog's listed as their own when I know for sure they don't own them. It's obviously to promote puppy sales. For the people who actually do own the dog and the public, it's fraud. Saying you have puppy by so and so is one thing, but listing a dog as belonging to that kennel when he is not owned by them is another. Has anyone else noticed this?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,099
|
Is it possible they don't own them, but use them?
__________________
- Berleen - Knuckles - born 8/21/11 - my big knuckleheadand can't forget Saki; the Golden Retriever, Born 11/07/07 The felines that rule the house - Oliver, Serena, Sakura & Bastian. https://www.facebook.com/berleen |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 7,088
|
Breeders often show dogs they have used for breeding on their sites...nothing wrong with that - I have a page for a male I do not own, but his owner is clearly stated on the page. Some people do not go into detail, but consider that "everyone" knows they just used the dog for stud or have a pup from him.
Lee
__________________
Csabre Sch1, Hexe Sch2, Bengal, Kyra, Kira & Kougar v Wolfstraum ~ Basha Sch3, Ghost Sch3 - Danger Sch1 SAR - ATB/Ret - Kyra, Sch3, Alice Sch1, Kelsey, Fenja Sch3 wolfstraum.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,380
|
Are you sure they're claiming to own them? Or just that they use them? It's not uncommon for breeders to go outside of their own kennel to find a suitable mate for their bitches. Actually, I'd say it's more common for them to find an outside stud than use one of their own.
I'd personally rather see a breeder that goes outside of their own kennel to find a suitable male, because a breeder who thinks that all of their males/females will be a perfect pairing isn't the best breeder, IMO.
__________________
Ozzy - Chocolate Pom "In a perfect world, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog." My Photography |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,224
|
The term stud dog...simply means....dog used for "semen".
Unless someone states that the stud dog is owned by them.....it is just common practice to "exhibit" the stud dog that a breeder has used for breeding....whether owned by them or not. I've used stud dogs from other kennels both here and Germany...I would never think twice about "exhibiting" their photo on my website or litter advertisement.
__________________
Huerta Hof German Shepherds www.teamhuertahof.com ....where breeding is still considered an art.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
The Rescues Rule Administrator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20,697
|
Quote:
Acknowledges that you can say you have a puppy by so and so, but saying that the dog is your kennel's dog is another idea altogether.
__________________
Help IMOM help Pets www.imom.org You can help Anna help IMOM help people help pets help people win... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,380
|
Would you mind PM'ing me an example of of a breeder listing studs as their own?
__________________
Ozzy - Chocolate Pom "In a perfect world, every dog would have a home and every home would have a dog." My Photography |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,227
|
I wonder if they are really listed as such or of the OP assumes it. As already stated breeders do and should post breedings whether they own the stud or not. Can you image purchasing a puppy in which only the dam is listed? Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark, Ohio
Posts: 17,499
|
I know a stud owner who bred a bitch whose owner did exactly this. She put the dog on her website as her own. It was not appreciated by the stud owner, and she asked her to remove him from her site, which she did after a while.
I think that if you do not own the dog, then it costs NOTHING to list owned by _______ under his picture. I too think it is good to use outside studs, there is certainly nothing wrong with that. The reasons to list a dog as your own that is not, is to gain respect for owning such a dog, or to gain stud business for your own dogs. You can tell people who call, "Blitz" is currently unavailable, but I have "Fido" here with similar lines, etc, etc. Frankly, I think it is unethical to list a stud without listing the stud's owner with him. However, if you have a dog, whose pedigree you are showing, and that dog is closely related, putting the dog's photo in the picture pedigree, that's not a problem. The situation I was referring to had a page for each of their males and listed my friend's dog as one of their males. Since I bred to this same dog, I had my puppy buyers calling me and asking me if my friend sold her dog. That should never happen.
__________________
RIP Arwen, CD RN CGC ![]() RIP Whitney, RN CGC ![]() Jenna, RN CGC Babs, CD RA CGC Herding Instinct Certificate Heidi, RA CGC Tori, RN CGC SG3 Odessa, SchH1, Kkl1, AD Ninja, RN CGC Milla, RN CGC Joy, Star Puppy, RN CGC Dolly & Bear |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |