|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: ontario -
Posts: 5,762
|
ewww - too late to add to the above -
this would be a better example of what makes a line - using Mink Jenny vom haus Ming haus Ming liked to use Mink - is Greif Lahntal - so if you start adding Sagus Busecker Schloss through Tiekerhook , or Leerburg's combination of Mink to Sagus in the mother line as here USA Otis vom Jacobiner Schloß -- one generation forward as here Fendi vom Leerburg then it becomes a line - Sagus one Belgian breeding was 2 - 2 on the sire and the dam had Mink in the 3 rd . I had looked at Lewis Malatesta myself to add into a particular line - |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 792
|
Original OP here - wow I started this thread a long long time ago
![]() So what would be minimally sufficient to consider dog x to be linebred to dog y? Is it 3-4, 5-5, or in this example 4-3,3? I don't think many do closer than 2-2 and for that matter 2-2 is not something I've seen a lot (but I could be wrong about ALL of the above)... I look at the thread and think, yea one occurrence of Mink in the pedigree doesn't mean much so I know better now, but I am curious what is the furthest back you generally look at when looking for a dog bred from x line and such. Again, what I said above could be self-explanatory, but humor me considering that I know next to nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Zombie Queen Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,079
|
or if a dog is not line bred but its sire or dam is, is that considered any thing?
My dog's sire is 5,5,5-5 in one dog. Would that dog be considered to have any signficant influence on the outcome of my puppy or not? My own dog is not considered to have any linebreeding. I am not asking a specific question relative to my dog but a general one to supplement ayoitrzrimz' question. Because it seems I see a lot of WL dogs where parents are linebred to one dog, the offspring is not, then offspring with no linebreeding (at least for 5 generations) are bred and produce a next generation with new linebreeding. It almost seems to be a dance.
__________________
Nancy www.scsarda.org Beau -NAPWDA Certified Cadaver Dog Waiting at the Bridge (italics=GSDs) (hemangiosarcoma=blue):Grim , Cyra, Toby, Rainbow, Linus, Oscar, Arlo & Waggles |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Crowned Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 8,294
|
the dog is not linebred because the top [the father or sire] has no dogs in common with the bottom (mother or dam) - the topside is ???? Pet lines probably, maybe some ASL and at least one dog in 5 or 6 is German showlines...
The bottom has Mink twice I think - once through Lewis, once through Crok...also Nick H., and then Brawson for the Czech lines... It is such an open pedigree, it is just a shot in the dark to try to predict anything Lee
__________________
Csabre Sch1, Hexe Sch2, Bengal, Komet, Kyra, Kira & Kougar v Wolfstraum ~ Ziberia BH ~ Danger Sch1 RH SAR ~ ATB~ Kougar Sch3, Kyra Sch3, Cito Sch2, Alice Sch1, Kelsey CD, Ret ~ Basha Sch3, Fenja Sch3 wolfstraum.net |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |