|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
|
I always considered the "rear foot hop" to be a bad thing. Admittedly, I have always judged a dog's weave pole performance on speed (of course), but also on front foot placement. It seems to me that when you only see one front foot hit per side, that's when the dog has the best chance at being fast. Notice the front foot placement in most of these dogs:
The very fast ones (and wow- what a great group of weavers!) or only putting one front foot down per side. Contrast that with this dog (see 0:22): ...Big difference. And yes I realize the second video is in slow motion. ![]() What is (perhaps) more interesting is to take a look at the rear feet. Like I said, I always watch the front feet on weaving dogs, but have started noticing this "rear foot hopping" motion in Pimg as she is weaving. When I rewatch the first video, looks like all the fast dogs are placing both rear feet on each side. Interesting. And note- even the slow Cavalier Spaniel is "hopping" on its rear legs. So maybe there is something to be said about rear foot placement. I am thinking that it is likely less important than front foot placement though. Anyone happen to have a good article or video on proper foot placement in weave poles?
__________________
Willy Pimg - DOB: 2/06, CL1-R, CL1-S, CL1-F, CGC |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 2,242
|
I'm very interested to see what people say about this. When Mikko was weaving with 22" poles, both his front and rear legs were placed one at a time, and his weaves were really fast. Now that everything he does is 24", his rear legs hop, as his front legs do one and one, and he is slower. I've been trying to speed him back up.
__________________
Mikko GM, RM, AAD, ASA, SJ, SS, EAC, EJC, TN-E, TG-E, WV-O, OCC, HP-O, VerO, NAJ, CGC - 6 year old GSD |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
|
Quote:
__________________
Willy Pimg - DOB: 2/06, CL1-R, CL1-S, CL1-F, CGC Last edited by wildo; 08-29-2011 at 09:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
|
I did too! But gotta say- I've been looking at agility videos for an hour or so now. After watching this one, wow- this first video I posted in this thread no longer looks like fast dogs at all... Of course, they are fast, very fast, but the dogs in this link are exceptional in all senses of the word. Purina Agility Challenge- Incredible!
__________________
Willy Pimg - DOB: 2/06, CL1-R, CL1-S, CL1-F, CGC |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Knighted Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
|
So- to summarize the styles seen so far, we have three options:
So perhaps we can generalize a theory such as this: The larger the dog, less foot contact per each individual weave pole gap is desired. As dog size decreases, foot placement may increase.
__________________
Willy Pimg - DOB: 2/06, CL1-R, CL1-S, CL1-F, CGC |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 355
|
There was a great thread on the Clean Run Yahoo group back in June on single striding vs. hopping. A couple of articles were posted also. I think the articles posted were in regards to the physical safety of the methods of single-striding versus the hopping.
__________________
Kristin Tara CGC - GSD 2008 Suli - Blue Kitty 2006 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |