I have watched both and both have their positive & negatives.
I personally prefer Cesar to Victoria. Cesar's methods worked for me and I couldn't have been happier with the results.
Just b/c I am not a fan of Victoria does it mean that I will bash her. Hey she has her own show with her own followers and at the end of the day if someone can watch something and learn and apply it to their situation and it works, then great. The same goes for Cesar. Victoria doesn't really work with the type of cases that Cesar works with and vice versa.
Do I think Casar can be rough at times? Sure. But at the end he has passed on some knowledge and helped the person with their situation and it is up to them to continue and follow thru.
I think people take it more personal than they need to. Look at what problems you have and try some methods from both and see what works for you and leave it at that. At the end of the day both people have helped dog owners become more aware of their actions as to why theeir dogs are the way they are and what techniques they can try to correct it. People say Cesar is all force but he is open to try different techniques and you see it more on his later shows than his earliers one's.
You have to use what works for you and move forward. It situation may require a different technique.
I agree with someone said and Cesar points this out which I had to learn, "Not all dog lovers make the best dog owners."
|